Tuesday, October 26, 2010

Obama's Last Ditch Effort


With one week left before the midterm elections, Obama's senior advisers can now see the contours of a landscape they all concede is vastly different from the one they traversed just two years ago.

But the news, they insist, is not all bad. Despite widespread predictions of a Republican blowout, Obama's team claims that early voting data and the latest polling shows hills as well as valleys. "It's not consistent," said one senior Obama aide. "In places where we have a strong turnout operation, we'll do OK and better than expected. Pennsylvania, Ohio and even Illinois is improving. In other places, where the turnout operation is weak, we're in trouble."

"Many of the House districts," the aide said, as a matter of fact.

Sure enough, in Senate races across the country, the contests have grown closer in these final weeks. In Colorado, the recently appointed Senator Michael Bennet has closed a high single-digit deficit against Republican Ken Buck to turn the race into a technical dead heat. In Pennsylvania, Democrat Joe Sestak has done something similar to cut his deficit against Republican Pat Toomey.

But elsewhere, the trend seems to be running in the other direction. In Obama's home state of Illinois, his friend Alexi Giannoulias is struggling to close a small but consistent gap against Republican Mark Kirk. That race, like so many others, remains well within the polls' margin of error.

So it's no surprise that President Obama's final campaign swing next weekend takes in Philadelphia and Chicago. What's less expected: He's ending his tour in Cleveland, where Democrats hope a strong late showing by Governor Ted Strickland could help tip the balance in a handful of House races in a battleground state that continues to tilt toward the GOP.

In searching for hopeful signs on a bleak horizon, Obama's team also points to surveys showing a huge portion of the voting population that remains undecided. According to a recent Associated Press poll, as many as one third of likely voters are undecided and say they could change their mind. Of those persuadable voters, 45 percent favor Republicans versus 38 percent who favor Democrats. Two years ago, just 14 percent of voters were undecided at this point, according to another Associated Press poll.

Those late deciders could easily break for the GOP, or choose to sit out the midterms altogether, and just stay home. But the large number of undecideds remains a key factor in the volatility of polling—and predicting elections—at this late stage of the 2010 cycle.

Where would that be?

The president's political aides attribute the tightening of many races across the country to the Democrats' efforts to sharpen the contrast with their Tea Party-influenced Republican rivals—and play up the flood of money into GOP coffers from wealthy individuals and corporations.

"The messaging has been working," said one senior Obama adviser. "It has started over the last couple of months to reenergize Democrats, to present this election as a very clear choice about moving the country forward or taking it back to giving free rein to the special interests, to let them write the rules of the economy that brought it to the brink of disaster.

"You have a weakened Republican brand, a weakened Republican image in this country, where voters don't trust Republicans. Ordinary working voters don't trust Republicans to put their interests ahead of big corporate interests, which are funding their campaigns. They know they have written their own rules and it's the Republicans who have tried to protect the interests of companies like BP, when President Obama required BP to pay every dime of the damage that was done. It was Republicans who voted against financial protection for consumers and against reform of credit-card companies. The American people know that."

The Obama team's hopes have been revived in California—a solidly Democratic state—where their own candidates have been outspent heavily, yet continue to hold slender leads. If the pundits' predictions of a wave election were true, they say, California would be long gone, given the amount of cash spent on TV advertising for Republican candidates.

That leaves Democrats with the limited comfort of arguing on November 3rd that Republicans have fallen short of their own sky-high expectations, even as they gain dozens of seats in the House. "We've got expectations exactly where we want them," said one senior Obama aide.

That may be wishful thinking. Whatever happens on Nov. 2, the White House political team is already busy mapping strategy for the next phase of Obama's presidency.

The White House plans to test Republicans' unity and political resolve on three controversial issues: repealing the Bush tax cuts, implementing the deficit commission's findings, and pushing immigration reform. Obama's team says that these issues will make for good policy—and good politics, forcing Republicans elected in swing districts to choose between placating Democrats and independents and risking a possible Tea Party challenge in 2012.

The White House believes immigration reform may be the toughest test for the GOP—even tougher than tackling the deficit. "This will separate the reasonable Republicans from the pack running for president," said one senior Obama aide.

8 comments:

NicholasCurry said...

I always have trouble believing polls and percentages; they never really seems to be taken properly or without some agenda in mind. What I find most interesting about this article, however, is the huge number of undecided voters. It seems like now, more than ever, no one really knows who's right and who's wrong because every issue is so complicated and unsure. Im not sure if its any different now than it ever was but it sure seems like it.

Sara Abdel 1st said...

Ithink what the Obama team is doing is great . But I don't get why the races are so competitve like that. I mean well I guess I kinda get it. I also would like to say that I really hope that the GOP wins. Lol

Pierre Von Cynical said...

i love how they treat the term "republican" like a bad word. Either everyone has to be "a bad republican" or a "democrat"

When they said that the republicans supported BP, i don't remember any real controversy over that except for the fact that they were trying to fix the mess, this article is trying to say that all republicans are trying to get President Obama out of office by dirty tactics, and that is low.

Either way that the midterm elections go this time, I can be confident in the fact that not ALL Republicans hate President Obama, its once again an issue of opinion, everything in life is a subject of opinion. Granted I don't agree with him on some points but i don't hate the President.

They might as well get used to the fact that "you will never make everyone happy" that will make the process SO much easier, I will say this again, focus on your campaign, not what the Big Bad Republicans are doing.

Are we talking about politicians trying to exploit wrongs? Or are we talking about children tattle-telling on one another?!

Richard Windisch 2 said...

I'm tired of all of the noise about GOP spending coming from the left. Once again I am going to attack hypocrisy. While, yes, the Republicans have been spending massive amounts of money on this campaign, Democrats have significantly OUTspent the opposition. It is nothing short of lying to attack the opposition when you are doing more of the same thing. This administration has been outspending the Bush Administration and continuing to point fingers about their spending and pointing out GOP spending while they are outspending them and refusing to disclose donors while they are on a witch hunt about that very issue.

Maggie Duke said...

In the American voter,less than half of the voters were considered "Nature of the Times" voters. This was in 1960, and obviously, things have changed. Over the last decade, and really over the last several months we have seen Americans blame politicians for the world's problems. Not that the blame is completely unwarranted, but many average Americans don't care about accuracy.

Take the Tea Party, for instance. It's entire slogan and the whole reason for its avid success is that it claims "Taking back America!" About as close to an over throw over Gov't that we plan on getting I suppose. But the Party itself is only hitting on thing: American Voter's Frustrations; from the Economy to the Oil Spill, Voters are not happy with something and all they can think to claim is that their no happy with the way Washington it running things.

As such, we see this display: Party changing every term. Clinton, then a break with 2 Bush terms, the Obama. Democrat, Republican, Democrat, and now there is an expected republican BLOWOUT. It will be interesting to see how the midterms turnout and fasinating to hear the results of the presidental election, but let's not forget one manotonously childish thing:

"When ever you point your finger at something, all remember that there are three point back at you."

Chin-lin Yu 5 said...

Even though its true the voting data is inaccurate its not enough to overcome the Republican's lead. I think its inevitable at this point.

JafferSamad1 said...

I don't understand what's wrong with Obama trying to help the cause of the democrats. That's just politics isn't it? People can choose whether or not they agree with ideas of republicans or democrats, whoever seems to have the more appealing ideas usually wins. Anybody can support whoever they want because these votes are about everybody's wants and decisions and that's determined by whoever has the most appealing ideas the republicans or the democrats.

jamescooper2 said...

It does appear that the Republicans may come up even with the Obamacrats but they won't completely take over as many suspect and/or hope. Though, I think that PRESIDENT Obama should quit warring for his party just because they think it would help them. He should stay in D.C. more than just a few days at any one time. As a leader of the country he should worry more about the people instead of trying to out maneuver them. The Obamacrats seem to have lost the big reason for why they are supposed to be in office, including Obama.