Thursday, March 8, 2012

Mitt Tries to Break Southern Losing Streak


Mitt Romney and his super PAC are pouring energy, money and manpower into next week’s Alabama and Mississippi primaries, attempting to gain a firmer upper hand over his challengers and perhaps finally clock a victory in a competitive Southern contest.

To win either of those deepest of Deep South locales would be to reverse what has become, for Romney supporters, one of the most dismaying and embarrassing trends of the 2012 primaries: that Romney could become the GOP nominee, but only after being roundly and repeatedly rejected in the party’s geographic core.

Even as his campaign argues that Romney has amassed a decisive delegate lead over his GOP opponents, his weakness across the South remains a glaring deficiency. The only Southern state Romney has taken so far is Virginia, where Newt Gingrich and Rick Santorum failed to qualify for the ballot. Everywhere else — from South Carolina in January to Tennessee and Georgia this week — Romney has lost by significant margins, getting routed with voters who call themselves “very conservative” and among the white evangelicals who make up much of the GOP base, according to exit polls.

Team Romney could well counter, “So what?” Both Alabama and Mississippi distribute delegates proportionally and it’s unlikely that either Gingrich or Santorum can make a serious dent in Romney’s delegate lead. In these states, as well as the others Romney has already lost, there’s no doubt that he would win them as the nominee.

Even if the delegate math doesn’t add up, a Santorum win in these states — or the Kansas caucuses this weekend — would further underscore Romney’s problems among conservatives and give the former Pennsylvania senator additional energy as the primary drags onward.

There are plenty of signs that Romney strategists are reluctant to accept that their candidate will never be a Southern kind of guy. Advisers have been eyeing areas where his establishment-businessman profile might have appeal as the super PAC Restore Our Future has softened up both states by pummeling Romney’s opponents on the air.

In other words, they’re doing what it would take to win there — if winning is even an option.

“We’re an underdog. But we are an organized underdog who’s got a base that’s excited here in Mississippi, so we have a shot,” said Austin Barbour, the Mississippi Republican strategist supporting Romney.

Though the March 13 states look like more hospitable terrain for Santorum and Gingrich, Barbour suggested that a full airing of Romney’s record — focused on his electability, private-sector background and fiscal management in Massachusetts — could win over voters in urban and suburban areas, along the Gulf Coast and in the fast-growing Memphis suburbs in the northern part of the state.


“The focus really, throughout this race, has been on all these other states. It hasn’t been on the South,” Barbour said. “We win because we do well on the coast, we do well in the city of Jackson, we do well in pockets of the Jackson suburbs and then we do well in DeSoto County.”

Former Mississippi Sen. Trent Lott, a Romney endorser and fundraiser, said that “even in Mississippi” there was a sense that it’s time for Republicans to begin rallying behind an eventual nominee.

“Inevitability is setting in. … People who have been holding out now for a while are ready to get behind him,” Lott said, suggesting that voters “have seen some of the baggage that Newt and Rick have.”

With women voters in particular, Lott said, “Newt certainly has problems in that area.”

As of Thursday, all three major GOP candidates are set to have a paid-media footprint in Alabama and Mississippi. The pro-Gingrich super PAC Winning Our Future reserved nearly $700,000 in airtime for the two weeks before the primaries and Santorum’s campaign invested about $100,000 in cable TV and radio ads starting Thursday, media-buying sources said.

By far the most imposing presence on the airwaves, in the mail and over the telephone lines, has been Romney, whose super PAC boosted him and pounded Santorum with well over $1 million in TV ads and no fewer than four pieces of campaign mail. The pro-Romney group Restore Our Future has also run automated calls attacking Santorum in both March 13 states. Starting Thursday, the Romney campaign is airing six figures’ worth of ads.

Romney has also earned a host of gold-plated endorsements in both states, including from Lott and Mississippi Sen. Thad Cochran, former Alabama Gov. Bob Riley, and most Alabama and Mississippi statewide Republican officials. That may count for something in states that GOP strategist Chris Henick, a Mississippi native, described as having a “sleepily surprised realization that this presidential primary is upon everybody.”

“Mississippi has always been more of a regimental, establishment state when it comes to presidential politics,” he said. “You would think Romney has that built-in advantage — and he does, in terms of endorsements.”

Still, veteran local politicos say it would take a confluence of lucky events for Romney to win a pair of states that are as conservative and evangelical as they come — and entirely alien from Romney’s brand of New England Republicanism.

“I’d guess Newt would probably win, but it’s going to be close between him and Santorum,” said Clarke Reed, the longtime operative known in Mississippi as the father of the state’s Republican Party. “It’s a strong, evangelical element that we’ve got. I’m kind of one of them, but I’m probably going to vote for Romney.”


Bradley Byrne, a former Alabama state senator who ran for governor in 2010, said flatly: “I don’t think Gov. Romney’s going to be in a position to win Alabama.”

“I think he’ll have a reasonably good showing here, I just don’t think he’ll come in first, nor do I think he’ll come in second,” Byrne said. “Partly, it’s just geographic. He’s not from down here. … Whether this perception is accurate or not, they perceive that he’s not as conservative as we are.”

It remains to be seen just how hard Romney will campaign in the Deep South primaries. He’s due to visit Pascagoula and Jackson, Miss., and Birmingham, Ala. on Thursday and Friday but hasn’t announced a full schedule beyond that. Santorum and Gingrich have committed to participating in a Monday night candidates forum hosted by the Alabama Republican Party; Romney has not.

Gingrich and Santorum, meanwhile, have already started on a whirlwind campaign tour of the March 13 battlefields, explicitly pointing to Tuesday’s votes as a chance for Republicans to send a not-Romney message and force another extension of the primary season.

For Romney to win next week, or to come in second in one or both states, he’ll be counting in part on Gingrich and Santorum to keep the conservative vote divided, with Gingrich leveraging his Southern cultural appeal to peel support from the more politically resilient Santorum.

The consolation prize, in any case, would be a handful of the 90 delegates up for grabs. T.J. Maloney, the executive director of the Alabama Republican Party, said “it’s not unrealistic to think all four candidates” might win some delegates in the contests he described as almost a joint primary.

“Alabama and Mississippi, since we’re going on the same day — geographically, demographically, we’re almost the same state,” he said.

That means the pair of states has the potential to send a strong signal in the Republican primary, one way or another, by swinging to the same candidate on the same night.

And regardless of the outcome, Republicans say that for once, they won’t have to worry about general election fallout from an explosive primary fight.

“It’s a strong social issue state, a heavy Bible Belt state,” Reed said. “And I think they’d accept Romney with pretty much open arms. The hard-core South is — we’re hard-core. We’ll be there regardless.”

36 comments:

Ellen Airhart 6 said...

It is obvious to all that Mitt Romney is not doing as well as he could have hoped. His failures in the Southern states, outlined in this article, will probably not cost him the GOP nomination, but will cost him in the ultimate presidential race.

Ellen Airhart 6 said...

It is obvious to everyone how much worse Mitt Romney than expected. The failures in many Southern states, outlined in this article, will probably not cost Romney the GOP nomination. However, his lack of popularity in the Republican base will come back to haunt him later in the presidential election.

katie-bethwright2 said...

I like Romney’s persistence; he is dedicated to the election. Although the “very conservative” has made it difficult for him to stay in the running he is still sticking with it. If Romney advertises more in the south he will get more votes, because they are less conservative.

TrevorSmith1st said...

I can understand wanting to win certain states to help you win the campaign, but i dont agree with how the canidates are going about doing it. I personally don't like the game of politics because it is a dirty, rotten, cut throat game to me. I would hope that there would be better and easier ways to play the game in order to help win the election.

Graham Pasewark- 6th Period said...

Recently, Romney has lost his lead to Santorum in the Candidate Caucuses. It makes sense that Romney, a devout Mormon, would like to use his religion to gain on Santorum in the Bible Belt. It will be interesting to see how this plan will play out, as many Christians do not believe in many of the beliefs that define Mormonism.

Bethany Ham 2nd Period said...

I think the fact that Romney is from Pennsylvania hurts him in some aspect because the people from the south may feel that they are more conservative than him, because he's not from the south. I feel like Romney has a better reputation and a cleaner past than Gingrich and Santorum, which I feel will ultimately pay off for him. Gingrich's past rubs the wrong way for some southerners and Santorum's resilient political views differ some southerners. However, if southerners continue to be split of Gingrich and Santorum, I feel like Romney will have a better chance at winning more of the southern primaries.

Bethany Ham 2nd Period said...

I think the fact that Romney is from Pennsylvania hurts him in some aspect because the people from the south may feel that they are more conservative than him, because he's not from the south. I feel like Romney has a better reputation and a cleaner past than Gingrich and Santorum, which I feel will ultimately pay off for him. Gingrich's past rubs the wrong way for some southerners and Santorum's resilient political views differ some southerners. However, if southerners continue to be split of Gingrich and Santorum, I feel like Romney will have a better chance at winning more of the southern primaries.

AdrianaAguilar2 said...

Although Romney has not been popular among the southern states, I believe he might have a better chance in the future primaries because Gingrich and Santorum are also struggling to gain popularity among Republican voters. Even so, Romney’s lack of popularity among conservative voters will continue to be a challenge. The fact that all three candidates have had to spend so much on more campaign ads and resort to attacks on their opponents is a testament to their desperation to gain a majority in the GOP now that time is running out and soon voters will have to rally behind a single candidate.

WeiverlyRoe said...

The difference among the geographical regions of the United States is astounding. The environment, ancient cultural factors, generational influence, and human nature have led to dense populations of people with the same mindset and beliefs. This is what makes the states so strong and unique, with such great regional identity. For politicians, each region or state is a completely new challenge requiring new strategies to be won over. It makes sense that the presidential race has been called a game.

Shannon Duggan 6th said...

As the Republican Primary continues to heat up, each state has a greater effect on the outcome. None of the candidates can hope to win the republican nomination without winning key southern states. It is therefore in their best interests to put their best foot forward in the coming southern primaries.

Jessica Alvarez ^th said...

I think its smart to focuse on the areas that you are weakest in. Romney sees what he needs to do and its putting forth a lot of effort to insure that he can get the votes he needs from the states that have yet to accept him. I feel that it may be a lost cause on those states that feel he just isn't as conservative as they are but it would look worse if he didn't try at all.

Haylee Duke 1st said...

Mitt Romney shouldn't even be labeled as a conservative. He supports big government and mandates. His healthcare plan that he established and mandated in the state of Massachussettes is similar enough to Obama's that that should automatically disqualify him from the GOP nomination. He has changed his policies 180 degrees in the past 10 years its downright ridiculous. People need to open their eyes and realize the false promises that are being spouted out right in front of them. Just like Obama, this man will prolong the economic crisis, without advocating any policies that will ultimately result in improvements in the economy.

Kenia Nevarez 1st Period said...

Mitt Romney, has been trying hard to get votes. No party wants to support him but he isn't giving up. Romney has formed his own party and he is trying hard to finally clock a victory , by pouring energy, money and manpower into Alabama's and Mississippi's primaries. He might not have as much support as he would like, to but he is showing he is strong , and he isn't giving up so easily.

Jasmine Mitchell 2nd Period said...

I haven't really followed this campaign, but Mitt Romney seems determined to get the support of the southern states because it may strength his campaign. If he talks right and presents his case right, he will have the support of the southern states. The southern states are supportive as long as everything the campaigner says and does is in their favor.

Andrew Garcia 02 said...

Many of Romney's issues don't mesh well with hard-core southern conservatives. His voting record is holding him back in the states he's trying to get, and I think that will show in the primaries. If he doesn't get the south behind him, then he doesn't stand a chance as a legitimate republican candidate. The south is where he can get many easy votes, he just has to change quite a few minds on how his voting record has been questionable. He needs to reassure the majority of voters to win, and I don't think he can do it.

TaniaNevarez1st said...

Romney is doing a good job of taking matters into his own hands. Going to Alabama and Mississippi to get more votes was a great way of showing that he is not afraid to make things happen for himself. I think that by Romney doing this he is showing a lot of potential, and strength. Romney isn't giving up that easy and he's fighting for what he wants!! A lot of people are going to admirer him for not giving up and who knows he might even win some votes from Alabama!(:

Danielle Gonzales- 6th period said...

I honestly do not know what is going on in the elections right now but, from reading this article Santorum is in the lead and Romney is trying to receive more votes from the southern states to try and win the election. Romney and Santorum are both trying to appeal to the southern states but it looks as if, Romney is on their better side. Therefore, Romney will most likely end up getting the votes he needs to win this election.

Danielle Gonzales- 6th period said...

I honestly do not know what is going on in the elections right now but, from reading this article Santorum is in the lead and Romney is trying to receive more votes from the southern states to try and win the election. Romney and Santorum are both trying to appeal to the southern states but it looks as if, Romney is on their better side. Therefore, Romney will most likely end up getting the votes he needs to win this election.

IsaacAguilera-1 said...

It's kind of interesting how Romney went from being the obvious and only candidate to just another fighter with a mediocre lead. I still think he will win. His media presence is simply the largest. The overall population knows more about him than either of the other candidates. And Ron Paul just fell off a cliff or something.

Jay Grattan said...

At this point the republican primary seems to be no more than a forgone conclusion. Every once in a while someone besides mitt Romney has a glimmer of hope, especially when mitt offhandedly reveals his opulence with intensely unfunny jokes (or maybe they're not jokes). This article addresses that Romney has been "rejected" by much of the republican party, however this is true for every current candidate. Thanks a lot Chris Christie.

Winter Chambers 2 said...

It appears that Mitt Romney has many opportunities to make a big break in the south and win many states but he is wanting to only do the bare minimum. If the trends of the lack of support in the south is so embarrassing to Romney a person would think Romney if he truly wanted wins the south would become a main priority. From a person who lives in the south if Romney can not find a firm grip on the south and its votes how will the south respond if he has to lead the country. It is true not everyone will like the president but when an entire section does not like a candidate maybe the candidate is not a good pick for president.

Tyler Conner 1 said...

I like Mitt Romney I think he would be a very good president, and being a republican I am hoping that he wins over the south. With Romney being a business man and using that for a lot of his campaigning this should really help him. The south is mainly business and get a long with a lot of republican candidates since the majority do business.

AmberCastillo1 said...

I think mitt Romney still has a chance to win wether the states are conservative or not he just has to put his best foot forward and take a swing . And even if he doesn't win the states you can still have split votes for santorum and Gingrich making the loss not a severe. He shouldn't count himself out he still may have a chance. And wow 1 mill dollars for advertising he must really want to win.

priyankashome6 said...

Even if Romney does become the GOP nominee losing various primaries will hurt him when running against Obama. Like the article says, in order to win over the next few states Romney needs to focus on his electability and fiscal management. Romney has an advantage if the conservative vote is divided between Gingrich and Santorum. I think even though the delegate math isn't adding up these primaries it reflects badly on Romney for being rejected in his party's core geographic region.

Ellen Airhart 6 said...

Mitt Romney has struggled to gain the Southern states in the Republican primaries. Even if he does end up winning the Republican primaries, this lack of popularity in the Southern states may lead to a disadvantage in the presidential election.

CatWiechmann6 said...

I don't think that Romney is going to win very many southern states because I don't think that he appeals to the conservative southerners. He isn't from the south and his views are different. So I expect either Santorum or gingrich to win.

MirandaMartell1 said...

Im glad the south says no. :D! I dislike him. Im glad i get to vote this year,cause im not voting for Romney! I went to his website the other day and i did notice the Obama Failure that you could read and i was like really? To me it was all gibberish! And i noticed all the donate and right as you go to the website its basically,enter the amount of money you want to give me. No way. your not getting any of my money. To me hes really about the money and getting on the news and having the "15 minutes of fame". :)

BrittanyDonahoo1 said...

The reason why Romney is no better than Santorum or Gingrich to go against Obama is because he has no passion. Nobody likes him. He has yet to gain the support of more than 20% of registered republicans in any state. He is an Obama clone and we don't need him. Conservatives need to spend their efforts on the house and getting the Senate and worry less about Obama since Romney is the same as Obama.

Read more: http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0312/73766.html#ixzz1q5jJRQV7

Morgan Young -Pd.2 said...

I think the saddest part of this primary is not the incessant political quibbling and speculating, but the enormous amount of money spent by candidates to prop up their potential victories. If the idea behind the presidency is to support and help the American people, they are doing an unmistakably miserable job. I would like to think that the designers of our nation meant for the president to be the most honest, accountable, popular candidate, but I believe that elections and primaries now depend directly on the amount of cash a candidate and his supporters are willing to drop on a victory. The article says that Mitt Romney is now spending six figures just on advertising, much of which was used bash Santorum, and Newt Gingrich reserved $700,000 of airtime for the two weeks before the primaries. So much money is fed to the media that they are the real winners of this election, instead of many American people who need help in this economy but see so much money wasted on what seems more and more like a junior high popularity contest instead of a serious presentation of candidates' plans for the nation.

Morgan Young -Pd.2 said...

I think the saddest part of this primary is not the incessant political quibbling and speculating, but the enormous amount of money spent by candidates to prop up their potential victories. If the idea behind the presidency is to support and help the American people, they are doing an unmistakably miserable job. I would like to think that the designers of our nation meant for the president to be the most honest, accountable, popular candidate, but I believe that elections and primaries now depend directly on the amount of cash a candidate and his supporters are willing to drop on a victory. The article says that Mitt Romney is now spending six figures just on advertising, much of which was used bash Santorum, and Newt Gingrich reserved $700,000 of airtime for the two weeks before the primaries. So much money is fed to the media that they are the real winners of this election, instead of many American people who need help in this economy but see so much money wasted on what seems more and more like a junior high popularity contest instead of a serious presentation of candidates' plans for the nation.

Antonio_Jesus_Soriano_6thperiod said...

Mitt Romney is having trouble winning southern states due to his apparent flip-flopping on the major issues. This coupled with his proud mormon heritage spells disaster for the evangelical southern christians.

Robert Simpson 6th said...

Just as the article said many conservatives are wery of Romney because he comes from a nothern state and many fear he is not conservative enough. However, with this in mind it is obvious to all republicans that he is certainly more conservative than Obama and should he win the primaries he will have the full support of the republican party. It should also be noted that the media is tryng to portray infighting but this is only natural for primaries and we will be united for the presidential election.

JosephXin6 said...

"The only Southern state Romney has taken so far is Virginia", Since when was Florida not considered as a "southern state"? If i'm mistaken, Florida is the second most southern state in the United States, and I do believe Mitt Romney won the Florida Primary. With that said, I don't think it will be very likely that Romney will win many "southern states", but I do believe he has a decent chance to come runner up in any of the southern primaries. Gingrich and Santorum will probably split some of the conservative votes, giving Romney a chance to sneak up on the polls during the southern primaries.

JosephXin6 said...

"The only Southern state Romney has taken so far is Virginia", Since when was Florida not considered as a "southern state"? If i'm mistaken, Florida is the second most southern state in the United States, and I do believe Mitt Romney won the Florida Primary. With that said, I don't think it will be very likely that Romney will win many "southern states", but I do believe he has a decent chance to come runner up in any of the southern primaries. Gingrich and Santorum will probably split some of the conservative votes, giving Romney a chance to sneak up on the polls during the southern primaries.

Kristen_James2 said...

Romney is an unconventional candidate because he his the leading GOP candidate nomination by winning over delegates rather than winning over the people in the key southern states. This proves that our election process is a geographical battle at its roots. What I mean is that a wise strategy to winning the GOP nomination is knowing your geography; what you have, and what you need. Romney is a wise candidate because he has been able to lead the battle for the republican nomination without being a "southern kind of guy" .

Priya Parameswaran.1 said...

At the time this was written, Romney had a difficult angle with the southern states. There were many sides as to whether he would win, being the facts he wasn't from that area or he had a good enough chance. He put forth a lot of money into the ads that were placed around the states. With that much money in there, at the time one would think he would have had a good turnout. With Gingrich and Santorum in those states also, Romney might have to be careful. The victor of the three in the rest of the states will be interesting to see.