Tuesday, April 3, 2012

Obama Targets Romney


President Barack Obama's campaign accused Republican Mitt Romney of siding with "Big Oil" in a new television ad released Monday, signaling an escalation of a general election campaign and a vigorous debate over gas prices.

"In all these fights, Mitt Romney's stood with Big Oil - for their tax breaks, attacking higher mileage standards and renewables," the Obama campaign said in the new ad, which marked the first time the president's campaign has publicly attacked Romney by name and made clear it views the former Massachusetts governor as Obama's likely opponent next fall.

Obama's second ad of the presidential campaign came hours after the release of a similar spot by the Democratic outside group Priorities USA Action, which argued that the oil industry is trying to help Romney win the White House to protect its own profits and tax breaks.

The twin ads sought to blunt a $3 million-plus ad campaign launched by the American Energy Alliance blaming Obama for rising gas prices and his decision to delay the Keystone XL pipeline project. It reflected the degree to which Democrats feel vulnerable as gasoline prices top $4 a gallon in many U.S. markets and pose a threat to the economic recovery, the key benchmark in Obama's case for re-election.

Beyond energy, the ads made clear that Obama's campaign had entered a new stage in which it hopes to define Romney as being beholden to big business well before he secures his party's nomination and seeks to present himself as a viable alternative to Obama.

Romney's campaign and Republicans said the ads reeked of desperation from a White House grappling with high gas prices. Romney spokeswoman Andrea Saul said it was no surprise that Obama was "spending his soon-to-be $1 billion war chest to attack Mitt Romney and deflect blame for his failure to control gas prices."

The Republican National Committee, which is gearing up to help the GOP nominee quickly pivot to the general election, said Obama was "panicked" because his energy policies had "failed to do anything about soaring gas prices that are hurting families across the country."

The ads from the outside groups were airing in states expected to play a deciding role in the presidential election: Colorado, Florida, Iowa, Michigan, New Mexico, Nevada, Ohio and Virginia. The Obama campaign ad was appearing in six of those states but not airing in Michigan and New Mexico.

Obama's campaign has sought to shackle Romney to business and oil interests at a time when oil companies rake in soaring profits. It noted that the American Energy Alliance was run by a former lobbyist for Koch Industries, an industrial firm whose top executives are Charles and David Koch, both prominent supporters of conservative causes.

The ads, however, show the degree to which the Obama campaign needs to defend itself against unlimited money raised by outside groups supporting Republicans. Priorities USA has struggled to compete with some of its Republican rivals, forcing Obama's team to go on the defense and spend money on TV ads seven months before the election.

Appearing with the leaders of Canada and Mexico, Obama faced questions Monday at a White House news conference tinged with presidential politics. Obama defended his health care law following last week's Supreme Court arguments on the constitutionality of his signature accomplishment, saying he expected the court to uphold the law.

Asked about Romney's recent questioning of Obama's support for "American exceptionalism," the notion that America plays a unique role as the world's leading superpower, the president said his "entire career has been a testimony to American exceptionalism."

He then offered a sharp retort against Romney, whose quest for the Republican nomination has dragged into the spring against Rick Santorum and Newt Gingrich. "I will cut folks some slack for now because they're still trying to get their nomination," Obama said.

A few hours later, his campaign had disclosed its plans to strike back at Romney on television.

25 comments:

KellyKidder2 said...

Rising gas prices have had a large impact on American citizens because the effects cost every American money on a daily basis. Americans want gas prices lowered and this issue will have a huge impact on how they vote this year. With this being such a huge issue to the public, Obama should feel the pressure to push the blame onto his opponent rather then have the blame fall on him.

Lindsey Henderson 6 said...

I think that overall, the president handled this as expected of a president. However, it must be said that it is completely silly to believe that presidents have direct control over gas prices. Even if we tapped every oil reserve in America at this very moment, the price drops ten cents a gallon at most? Who should be blamed are the oil companies who are continually raising prices while oil is now $101 a barrel, the price it was over a month ago. Yet, prices of gas are still soaring. What's up with that?

It should be expected that any candidate will (and most definitely should) protect and refute any and all accusations, whether or not they have ground. Otherwise, people take it for bait and run with it.

Another thing that should be acknowledged is that Romney is indeed still a nominee, and will need as much fuel added to his fire to be able to clean these primaries up, win the nomination, and focus on a presidential campaign. No surprise he'll be trying to get some headway started now.

LibbyMargrave2 said...

With several claims about Obama's lack of action during his first term and worsening of gas prices, it's not a surprise that Romney is trying to soar ahead. Both men know how this game is played, it all depends on who will play it the best within the next 7 months.

Winter Chambers 2 said...

What I think most people forget and at times I even forget, is the fact there is political campaign going on. The people in the campaign are simply doing everything they can to improve his chances of being elected into the White House. Obama, being the president knows how important the oil prices are to Americans, and how he can make he look better by attacking Romney. I do not know if Romney is on the side of high oil prices but I do know that Obama attacking Romney is a good campaign strategy that will possibly make a few people change their minds when it comes to voting.

Victoria Sanchez 2 said...

To give Romney some slack, he's just doing what any other campaigning opponent would do to get his nomination and that's targeting issues that the American public wants resolved, such as rising gas prices. If that makes him seeming as beholden to businesses then thats exactly what people want. If our current president sees that as a threat then maybe he should be doing more to help with the issue than attack a potential opponent blatantly. I myself do not affiliate with any particular political party, so as a neutral spectator that's what it's looking like.

Chris Lopez 2nd said...

The Obama campaign is coming off as desperate to beat down Mitt Romney because they cant get the gas prices down before the election and are hoping to make Mitt Romney seem even less desirable as president. Even with the Obama campaign looking desperate Romney still might not win because there was a new poll that Obama held 70-80 percent of the Latino vote and Romney cant get a hold of much of their vote so if he cant attract more support from the Hispanic community he might lose anyway.

Graham Pasewark- 6th Period said...

Wow, what happened to Obama's policy he told the media about last week,where he would avoid worrying about his opponents until the actual Republican Candidate was chosen? Well, it looks like Romney is running against President Obama in the '12 Election, everyone!

Michael von Ende-Becker 6 said...

While his "attack plan" was disclosed, and it didn't go through, I do find it seemingly ironic that Obama says that Romney is "siding" with Big Oil, when in fact Obama did recieve large amounts of money from big oil companies back in 2008 when he was running for office! Just a little funny ironic fact I suppose.

TaniaNevarez1st said...

I don't understand why Obama's campaign is so worried about Romney, he's just trying to win the electio just like they are. If Obama faild to lower gas prices during his presidency, then there's nothing he can do about it. Romney is just trying to to win the election and he's doing it by telling people he can lower down the price of gas. In other hands I also think Romney is way over his head, saying he's going to lower gas prices, which I doubt simply because theirs not much he can do about it.

Tyler Conner 1 said...

What it comes down to is that Obama is worried about loosing the election to Romney. Gas prices have not gone down since Obama has been in office, Romney is at least trying to find a way to reduce the prices. Romney know that America needs a change. And Obama can see that more people are leaning to him since Obama hasn't done much about it, so that is why he is targeting Romney through political ads to make him look bad in from of the American people which is what all political candidates do.

IsaacAguilera-1 said...

Does anyone even care about these political attacks? Read the comments section on any similar article, and you'll see waves of people complaining about bickering, self-centered politicians. The public is getting tired of this constant fighting. Maybe the guys up top should focus on other things.

Ellen Airhart 6 said...

Rising gas powers will play a large tole in this election, as it has historically. Energy issues strike close to home, as they affect the price of virtually everything. Whichever candidate can present the best argument for their energy plans will have an advantage in the 2012 election.

WeiverlyRoe said...

Any little thing that someone doesn't like about America can be blamed on the president. Logic follows that there's the assumption the president had control over that event. General accusations against specific presidents dates back to the very first, George Washington. But the very core of our government is very explicit in that one person cannot have all the power. So how can one person have virtually all the blame? The president is a very powerful being, but even he or she can't control the nature of time.

Kenia Nevarez 1st Period said...

President Barack Obama's campaign accused Republican Mitt Romney of siding with "Big Oil" but this is just an accusation. How do they really know he did?
They don't. If they did Obama's campaign wouldn't have had disclosed its plans to strike back at Romney.
Obama is just mad because he is being accused for the high gasoline prices. He is just looking to blame someone for what he is being blamed for.

Morgan Young -Pd.2 said...

I don't think anybody should be surprised that Romney is receiving support from oil interests. Everybody is receiving support from something. Many politicians receive support from "green" interests, too. The fact is that no one can win or receive the nomination to run without one big, important supporter, so it's ridiculous to treat issues like this as being a secret to be exposed.

Priya Parameswaran.1 said...

Since it almost looks like Romney is going to take the Republican side, Obama seems to be pushing for advertisements. Romney's campaign had said that the ads were just a way to draw from Obama's hike in gas prices. Obama's campaign sought to show the defense behind the upcoming race. With November getting closer and closer, Obama might be a little scared of the outcomes. Right now he is still keeping his cool with the race. However, the ads are just the beginning of the next months Obama has to make himself "desirable" to a country struggling to fill up their tanks.

sarahmoore2 said...

It's very true that gas prices are on the rise. They are jumping everyday. The fact of the matter is that its going to go to the candidate with the better plan. Romney tax cuts for the big oil companies are given because they Are expected to find cheaper efficient ways of oil production and distribution. Obama has the same general plan. It will just come down to the candidate with the better plan.

BransenHenderson6th said...

Since Romney is most likely the opposing candidate that Obama will face, it makes sense that he would strike early. I wonder if the ads will be an effective preemptive strike, or just turn voters away since they dislike the attack ads.

AdrianaAguilar2 said...

I think that at this point no matter who is president, gas prices will stay at a relatively high price. Yes, this is hurting families across the country, but since it is probably inevitable, there's another way to look at it. Even if Romney becomes president and passes laws favoring big oil companies, hopefully these companies will expand and create jobs to help the economy. I don't think either candidate would have a huge impact on gas prices in the next four years.

Sabrina Siddiqui 6 said...

I think that Romney is the strongest frontrunner for the GOP nomination. The problem, though, is Romney is much more moderate than Gingrich or Santorum, which for more conservative Republicans, would be a problem. The only real threat to Obama having another term is Romney.

TrevorSmith1st said...

I don't understand why the game of politics always has to be slanderous. It doesn't seem very respectful for a current presidents campaign for reelection to rag on his opponents. It is also interesting that he is doing this without it being for sure that Romney is going to be his opponent in the up coming election.

priyankashome6 said...

Things are obviously heating up between Obama and Romney. It's pretty clear that Romney will be the Republican nominee so Obama is starting to take a bigger stand against him through various ads and campaigns. Obama wants to define Romney as being obligated to big businesses and Romney wants to define Obama as someone to blame for rising gas prices and delay of the Keystone XL pipeline project.

priyankashome6 said...

Things are obviously heating up between Obama and Romney. It's pretty clear that Romney will be the Republican nominee so Obama is starting to take a bigger stand against him through various ads and campaigns. Obama wants to define Romney as being obligated to big businesses and Romney wants to define Obama as someone to blame for rising gas prices and delay of the Keystone XL pipeline project.

priyankashome6 said...

Things are obviously heating up between Obama and Romney. It's pretty clear that Romney will be the Republican nominee so Obama is starting to take a bigger stand against him through various ads and campaigns. Obama wants to define Romney as being obligated to big businesses and Romney wants to define Obama as someone to blame for rising gas prices and delay of the Keystone XL pipeline project.

Shannon Duggan 6th said...

It is natural for Obama to begin targeting Romney, as he is the most probable candidate left. This being said, the marking of Romney as the candidate, also begins a new, more viscious round of mudslinging. Mudslinging seems to be essential to both party's campaigns, yet the effectiveness of these adds is questionable.