Monday, October 29, 2007

God's Politics


So how far do you think a candidate should go with their faith? Is it okay for candidates to wear their religion on their sleeves?


In S.C., Obama Seeks a Spiritual Reawakening
By Sridhar PappuWashington Post Staff WriterMonday, October 29, 2007; C01
CHARLESTON, S.C. -- As a man not only of God but of politics, the Rev. Joe Darby is an outspoken observer of the campaign scene. Reclining in his cluttered office at Morris Brown AME Church here, he witnesses the union between the pulpit and the polls.


"Politics does come down to some degree of emotion . . . ," says Darby, one of this state's most prominent African American preachers, whose church is a magnet for Democratic presidential hopefuls. "The Democratic Party is just catching up to that. It's been nauseatingly safe in recent years."


As if from Darby's mouth to Sen. Barack Obama's ears, the Democratic presidential candidate from Illinois -- hoping his campaign can recapture some of that old-time religious fervor -- launched a three-city gospel concert series over the weekend across the state, in North Charleston, Greenwood and Columbia. Although Obama did not attend the "Embrace the Change" series in person (instead campaigning in Iowa), he was here in spirit, appearing by video screen and sending out his surrogates, such as pastor Hezekiah Walker and singer Beverly Crawford.


Obama's campaign could certainly use reenergizing. Since he announced his intention to run for the presidency, Obama -- and the powerful ebb that surrounded him wherever he woke, spoke, ate and sat -- seems to have withered beneath the supernova that is the Clinton campaign. Today, the senator from New York carries with her a fortified sense of inevitability, laughing off controversies while appearing on Sunday morning shows, showing no wounds from questions about fundraising, absorbing Obama's criticism over the weekend regarding Social Security. A recent Washington Post-ABC News poll shows Clinton leading Obama by more than 20 percent, with a lead of 13 percent among African American voters.


Those numbers mirror polling results in South Carolina, where any candidate hoping to capture this early primary state needs much of the African American vote. But Obama cannot presume such support as he tries to catch Clinton, who has been embraced by many black voters.
As Obama races after the Clinton juggernaut, trying to go on the offensive, some of the state's more prominent Democrats see him as "dinking-and-dunking" instead.


"What needs to be done, what we need to do now, is get these young folks re-fired up," says former state senator Herbert Fielding, an Obama supporter who works at the funeral home that his family has run since 1912. "And in the process of getting the youngsters re-fired up, it will dispel doubts in the older community."


But the first two concerts, in North Charleston and Greenwood, certainly are not testament to young people being reinvigorated by Obama. Yes, there are young folk who'll pose outside the events with the navy-blue Obama 'o8 shirts they've just bought from a makeshift Obama store, alongside tables with voter registration forms and volunteer sign-up sheets. But more often than not, the gospel concerts are populated with the retired and nearly retired, people who learned long ago not to take their right to vote for granted and so are perennially drawn to the polls.


"I support him," says Blondell Smalls, a 67-year-old retired home-care worker from John's Island, at the North Charleston event. "I like looking at him, and it's time for a change."
And Matthew Rivers, 70, says, "He's knows what to do. He's not going in there fumbling."
The events themselves seem to straddle a strange line between political pep rally and old-school revival. At the first two concerts, Obama appears by video offering his regrets for his non-attendance and thanking those who've come. At the Greenwood event, a video is shown that begins with Obama's convention speech in 2004 and then retells his life story. In North Charleston, a video display of a speech given by Michelle Obama in Iowa gives rise to calls of "You go, girl!"
(The gospel series also draws attention because of the inclusion of the Grammy-winning gospel singer Donnie McClurkin, who has publicly said he overcame his homosexual thoughts and desires through prayer.)


Each concert stirs some of the fervor that typified the Obama campaign in its early days. As the gospel acts perform, people rise to their feet, mothers hug daughters, old friends reach out to one another and then embrace strangers. Couples hold each other tight. Some close their eyes and sway in their seats. In Greenwood, most of the room is drawn to the stage, leaping up and down as if it were a mosh pit. The concerts' playbook was open to innovation. In North Charleston, the sister combo of Mary Mary recalled Beverly Crawford to the stage after her set, asking her to sing a few lines of her song "Praise Jehovah." The following night, with the show running long, Byron Cage did an impromptu set with a group of young liturgical dancers before he jumped from the stage to jam with the believers who had surrounded the stage.
"We've got the faith," Obama senior adviser Rick Wade tells those assembled on the first evening. "But now it's time to go to work."

20 comments:

Abigail Ham said...

Religion should most definately be a major factor in the elections. After all, the USA was partially started BECAUSE of religion. I don't think it matters what religion is practiced, as long as there is one. I think we've been interpreting "Freedom of Religion" as "Freedom from religion", and it's about time that changed. All hail Obama!

thomas burk said...

I think that religion should be used by the canidates,as there is no problem using it as long as they do not impose the religion that they follow on the American public and if the canidates religious ways do not conflict with politics. They also have the responsibility not degrade other religions even if they don't agree with it's teachings or ways. If one of the canidates can accomplish a balance between religion and politics then that in its self will improve the public perspective and will boost the chances at presidency and a double term.

Cheyenne Bell said...

I think that for some candidates it is just natural for them to express themselves using religion. I do not think that if they discuss religion it will necessarily play a huge part in their role as president. Though on the other hand, it may for some, be what they base all their decisions on. To have a president with a strong religion is fine only as long as they don't take everything literally from it and they respect everybody not of their religion.

sarah lambert said...

I think religion is very important for a person to have but i dont think it should influence your politics. The decisions a president should make should involve what you think is best for your country not what your religion is. I mean Kennedy was the first Roman Catholic and everyone was afraid that he would make decisions from the pope but he never let his faith mess up his politics. I mean it should have some sort of influence on your decisions but it shouldn't dictate it. If i wasn't independent then i would probably vote for Clinton. No offense to Obama.

nick richards1 said...

hey, if your religion plays a part in whatever politics you believe in, that's cool. i think it just becomes a problem once you gain a "holier-than-thou" attitude about your beliefs and start setting up unnecessary barriers between you and someone else.

Grant Curry said...

Why shouldnt a canidate be permited to broadcast thier religon? Politicians base their campaigne on every other subject (War in Iraq, Enviroment, National Economy, etc.) why shouldnt religon be included? I think in a country where our rights are based apon freedome of speech/expresion it is absolutely permitable to show whatever aspect of yourself, regardless of who you are or what you aspire to be.

Grant Curry
4th period
Human Geography AP
9th Grade

Jessica Kaskie said...

Yeah, Abigail I agree! Religious leaders are influenced less by popular opinion than by thier moral values. In most religious backgrounds, people have to answer to a higher power rather than thier own wants and desiers, which makes them more dependable. A christian president is just what America needs, especially with all the tragities in our world today. We need a better leader, and Obama seems like a great option!

Jessica Kaskie said...

A religious leader will take his moral values over the popular opinion, which will make him much more dependable. A christain president is just what America needs with all the tragities in our world today. Obama seems like a great option!!!!

Millie Dorsett Period 3 said...

i think that the canidates religious standpoint is forsure influential to their decisions. If their religion plays a part in their poitical standpoint, then awesome. the problem occurs when they use their opinions and religious view point to fully choose their decision. Or if they try to force their religion on the American people.

Rockie Nolan said...

Canidates have a right to flaunt any religion they choose. In fact, when they do, it gives a lot of insight as to how they will handle situations in the country [the war - staying or leaving, for example] so I think it would actually benefit the voters to see that side of them.


As it has been said, when a canidate starts to shove their religion onto the citizens, is only when it should be an issue.

richard rangel said...

As I heard Obama explain how he will run in office during the debate, it really seemed like he was a very faithful man to the people and because of his religious faith and how he expresses it through song and prayer shows that he will do everything in his power to lead the people to a very peaceful world.

Religion is very important because most of the time you catch your self doing the good christian thing and when your the President the religious path is always the first thing to come to mind.

annie henderson 4th said...

Our country was founded and is still largely influenced by the religions of its citizens. It's no mistake that our pledge of allegance mentions God. There's absolutely no reason that the beliefs of a political candidate shouldnt be taken into consideration during campaigns, or while voters are at the polls. I think it's great what Obama's doing, and i fully support him.

Annie Henderson
AP Human Geography
4th period
9th grade

Jiaqi Niu said...

Religion should be a factor in the upcoming presidential elections. Religion is a big part of the country. USA is a free country and it should stay that way. A president who can make a good balance between religion and politics and make that happen.
Jiaqi Niu
4th Period
Human Geography AP
10th grade

Unknown said...

Chandra Carpenter
Government AP
Period 3

Candidates should not only reveal their religous beliefs, but voters should use this information to influence their choices. I think saying an individual's beliefs shouldn't be an issue is ridiculous. In choosing a representative, we give them control of policy, and unforseen issues will probably arise. We must fully believe in a candidate as a person, not as a political agenda, and that includes religion.

CandaceBalderas said...

I think it is ok for a politician to have a strong faith, and to make it known. People want to know a lot about a politician before they vote for them and i think religion is a big part of that. the only time a politiian's religion becomes a problem is when he starts making decisions based on his relioious beliefs and not what is good for the country.

Marlee Plummer said...

Yes canidates should be able to display their religion in any way. Religion is a major factor in elections and the voters should be aware of the canidates beliefs.

sarah lambert said...

On this one i didn't put my class at all! I am so sorry!!!!!

Sarah Lambert
Human Geography AP 4th period
9th grade

But i did do them!

Celesta Nave (hugeo4) said...

RELIGION is very important. But, it shouldn't control a candidates every decisions...WWJD? i think he would do the right thing let people think/practice what they want.

Celesta Nave
HuGeo 4
10th grade

Mollie Marie said...

Mollie Garza
U.S. Government
6th period
senior
So i think that a candidate should talk about their religion only because people care so much... but I do think that religion should not be something people care about... during elections you should focus on what a person is going to do for your country whether or not they are christian, catholic, musslim, or buddists. The only question in your mind should be... who's going to do what you want done when elected

JenniferRojas2ndperiod said...

I THINK RELIGION DOESN'T MATTER IN POITICS..IT DOESN'T MATTER FOR ANYTHING ELSE SO WHY SHOULD IT NOW?? BESIDES WHAT RELIGION YOU ARE DOESN'T REFLECT THE PERSON YOU ARE.