This editorial was written before the Christmas holidays but I just came across it again today.
We are close in Govt class to looking deeper at the issues of the 1st Amendment. Here is a taste of some of those issues.
By Harold Meyerson
As Christians across the world prepare to celebrate the birth of Jesus, it's a fitting moment to contemplate the mountain of moral, and mortal, hypocrisy that is our Christianized Republican Party.
There's nothing new, of course, about the Christianization of the GOP. Seven years ago, when debating Al Gore, then-candidate George W. Bush was asked to identify his favorite philosopher and answered "Jesus." This year, however, the Christianization of the party reached new heights with Mitt Romney's declaration that he believed in Jesus as his savior, in an effort to stanch the flow of "values voters" to Mike Huckabee.
My concern isn't the rift that has opened between Republican political practice and the vision of the nation's Founders, who made very clear in the Constitution that there would be no religious test for officeholders in their enlightened new republic. Rather, it's the gap between the teachings of the Gospels and the preachings of the Gospel's Own Party that has widened past the point of absurdity, even as the ostensible Christianization of the party proceeds apace.
The policies of the president, for instance, can be defended in greater or (more frequently) lesser degree within a framework of worldly standards. But if Bush can conform his advocacy of preemptive war with Jesus's Sermon on the Mount admonition to turn the other cheek, he's a more creative theologian than we have given him credit for. Likewise his support of torture, which he highlighted again this month when he threatened to veto House-passed legislation that would explicitly ban waterboarding.
It's not just Bush whose catechism is a merry mix of torture and piety. Virtually the entire Republican House delegation opposed the ban on waterboarding. Among the Republican presidential candidates, only Huckabee and the not-very-religious John McCain have come out against torture, while only libertarian Ron Paul has questioned the doctrine of preemptive war.
But it's on their policies concerning immigrants where Republicans -- candidates and voters alike -- really run afoul of biblical writ. Not on immigration as such but on the treatment of immigrants who are already here.
Consider: Christmas, after all, celebrates not just Jesus's birth but his family's flight from Herod's wrath into Egypt, a journey obviously undertaken without benefit of legal documentation. The Bible isn't big on immigrant documentation. "Thou shalt neither vex a stranger nor oppress him," Exodus says the Lord told Moses on Mount Sinai, "for ye were strangers in the land of Egypt."
Yet the distinctive cry coming from the Republican base this year isn't simply to control the flow of immigrants across our borders but to punish the undocumented immigrants already here, children and parents alike.
So Romney attacks Huckabee for holding immigrant children blameless when their parents brought them here without papers, and Huckabee defends himself by parading the endorsement of the Minuteman Project's Jim Gilchrist, whose group harasses day laborers far from the border. The demand for a more regulated immigration policy comes from virtually all points on our political spectrum, but the push to persecute the immigrants already among us comes distinctly, though by no means entirely, from the same Republican right that protests its Christian faith at every turn.
We've seen this kind of Christianity before in America. It's more tribal than religious, and it surges at those times when our country is growing more diverse and economic opportunity is not abounding. At its height in the 1920s, the Ku Klux Klan was chiefly the political expression of nativist Protestants upset by the growing ranks of Catholics in their midst.
It's difficult today to imagine KKKers thinking of their mission as Christian, but millions of them did.
Today's Republican values voters don't really conflate their rage with their faith. Lou Dobbs is a purely secular figure. But nativist bigotry is strongest in the Old Time Religion precincts of the Republican Party, and woe betide the Republican candidate who doesn't embrace it, as John McCain, to his credit and his political misfortune, can attest.
The most depressing thing about the Republican presidential race is that the party's rank and file require their candidates to grow meaner with each passing week. And now, inconveniently, inconsiderately, comes Christmas, a holiday that couldn't be better calibrated to expose the Republicans' rank, fetid hypocrisy.
8 comments:
The very hipocrasy of Christian United States politicians has been apparent to me since I first started having any idea about current politics. Christianity teaches kindness to all humans, yet some politicians support toture of semi-innocents and mal-treatmeant of illegal immigrants. Im not saying these issues shouldnt be dealed with, it just strikes me as odd that a politician can use thier religion to gain an office that will force them to make sever contradictions with said religions.
It just doesnt make sense.
Grant Curry
AP Human Geography
4th Period
9th Grade
Gillian Welch
3rd
Yeah right.
These people might think they're scoring votes with acts of piety but that's what it is - an act.
Albert Einstein said, "If people are good only because they fear punishment, and hope for a reward, then we are a sorry lot indeed."
See...the candidates are trying too hard to appeal to too wide an audience. Perhaps if one was a priest first, THEN wanted to run for presidency and only "preach to the choir", then we might see an interesting race. But no. No.
As Bertrand Russell said, "Religion is based...mainly on fear...fear of the mysterious, fear of defeat, fear of death. Fear is the parent of cruelty, and therefore it is no wonder if cruelty and religion have gone hand in hand....My own view on religion is that of Lucretius. I regard it as a disease born of fear and as a source of untold misery to the human race."
in my opinion, government officials and us voters should not bring religion into politics. politics has nothing to do with what or who you worship or believe in. Politics is about changing specific things with in a country a specific way. you shouldn't go around proclaiming that you are a christian every speech or debate you are in. it's ridiculous. why is there no law about Government being seperated from the church, i mean at least here. it would make things less complicated and more logical.
Brandon Christophe
Government (6th)
This article highlights a very big flaw in the American political system: religion for votes. Honestly, I don't care whether George W. Bush, Mitt Romney, or Mike Huckabee are Christians or not. Either way if they are a candidate in the GOP then they are going to embrace Christianity and flaunt it like there's no tomorrow. Throughout Bush's Presidential career I have a hard time believing that he made a majority of his policies based on his personal religious beliefs (I say this as I look at "The Faith of George W. Bush" by Stephen Mansfield on my dresser; no joke).
Though the separation of church and state almost exist in the United States it will be a long time before political candidates stop flaunting their beliefs to gain a constituency. Let's just hope that this long time isn't too long.
Phillip Duffy
I really differ with Meyerson on his take on hypocrisy. It seems like he is speaking on something he doesn't know a lot about. And I really don't think he is practicing religion, which means Meyerson probably should not be the authority on the subject. I know that there are a lot of Republicans that do not pratice religion either, but most of them are either Moderates or extremley left leaning Republicans. But there are millions of Evangelicals and Christians all over the United States that do.
I think that Meyerson should have looked in perspective when he said, "Republican candidates are growing meaner with each passing week," granted there has been some mudslinging, but has he been watching Obama and Hillary lately? It is like watching a cat and dog fight for hours on end.
So I really question Meyerson talking about religion, and I don't feel that he should talk about so many peoples, including my own, religion unless he can actually own up and find some himself.
Maybe somebody should write something about Meyerson and the Hypocrisy of the Democratic party...
Lindsay Huffhines
2nd Period
I have noticed a giant push for religious values in the political scene lately, and I don't agree with most of it. Mike Huckabee spouts his religious ideals with a fervor, which he has a right to do, but then he forces them on the rest of the country. Many of his plans involve "christianizing" America, which I think America doesn't need, at least by a politician. Huckabee is melding church and state, not keeping them separated. The second the government is allowed to govern or mandate religion, we lose that freedom.
A push for Christianity has been more evident in the Republican race throughout the years. I would just as quickly vote for Mitt Romney if he had political ideals and a voting record that I agreed with. Religion should be a personal thing, and shoving it on an entire nation is wrong, especially when the leaders doing the shoving aren't obeying their own commands. Now, many people go to church on Sunday, and then act in a complete contradiction to what they claim to believe in, it's just more evident in leaders of the country. The media focuses on their every word, and we can easily see the hypocracy. Most people are driven by hypocritical ideas, and this is why we should keep religion, in any form, out of government.
This is an ongoing controversy in the United States, even outside the political race. Separation of Church and State is quite the target in the 2008 (In)Decision. From Obama being a "closet muslim" to the Republicans fighting for the Christian Delegation. Just the fact that e-mails were spread to cause opposition towards Obama by accusing him of being muslim shows the effect religion has on our melting pot of a nation.
Honestly I do not see a problem with political candidates talking about religion and their beliefs. I want the leader of my country to actually have morals. Unlike some we have had in the past. I understand the point Meyerson is trying to make, but it is very weak. Using only a small portion of the Bible, you can not validate his point. Meyerson says the Republican Party "acts like cats and dogs." Have you taken a look at Hilary and Obama lately?
Post a Comment