Tuesday, March 30, 2010
Obama Gets Aggressive
President Barack Obama, after a year of fitfully searching for compromise, is taking a more aggressive tack with his Republican adversaries, hoping to energize Democratic voters and possibly muscle in some Republican support in Congress.
On Thursday, the president challenged Republicans who planned to campaign on repealing his health-care bill with, "Go for it." Two days later, he made 15 senior appointments without Senate consent, including a union lawyer whose nomination had been blocked by a filibuster.
At a bill-signing event Tuesday, he is set to laud passage of higher-education legislation that was approved despite Republican objections through a parliamentary maneuver that neutralized the party's filibuster threat.
On Thursday, Mr. Obama will be in Maine, home state of two moderate Republican senators who opposed his health-care plan, to promote the health law.
Even his surprise trip to Afghanistan on Sunday mobilized the perks of the presidency to marshal public opinion, as pictures were beamed home of Mr. Obama mobbed by U.S. troops.
A senior Democratic official said the push was a textbook case of taking advantage of political momentum as the campaign season begins. Republicans are "on the defensive," the official said, "and as long as they're not cooperating, we ought to keep them there."
Republicans say Mr. Obama's overtures to them have been for show, whether it was his January meeting with House Republicans in Baltimore or last month's televised, bipartisan health-care summit.
The partisanship "may be more visible, and he may be more resolute about it, but as far as most of us are concerned, this is business as usual," said Tennessee Sen. Lamar Alexander, a member of the Republican leadership.
But Mr. Alexander said the recent moves are broader, more public swipes that will hurt the president in the end.
He conceded that Republican leaders have tried to maintain unity in opposition. "When you have 40 Republicans, with your back against the wall and the gallows are right in your face, you're going to do your best to be unified," Mr. Alexander said.
The onus, however, is on the president to build relationships with minority leaders, Mr. Alexander said.
"If you're the president or a governor and you don't have a good relationship with the other party, that's your problem to solve," he said.
Mr. Obama campaigned on calling for an end to partisan bickering in Washington, but once in office he launched an ambitious agenda that pursued several long-held Democratic goals.
Meanwhile, Republicans decided at an early stage to aggressively oppose most of Mr. Obama's agenda. Partisan tensions have run high for most of his term.
Recently, Mr. Obama has been swinging particularly hard. He followed up his "go for it" taunt Thursday with the recess appointment of union lawyer Craig Becker to the National Labor Relations Board, adopting a tactic that presidents of both parties have used in recent decades to skirt the normal confirmation process. Mr. Becker's confirmation had been blocked in the Senate by a filibuster in February.
On Tuesday, Mr. Obama will sign what has been billed as a package of fixes to the health-care bill, approved under rules that required only a simple majority vote to pass in the Senate. That nullified Republicans' power to block it through a filibuster.
Democrats attached to the bill a major overhaul of student-lending laws, which eliminated a federal subsidy for private tuition lenders, federalized most student loans and plowed the savings into expanded federal higher education aid. Republicans say the bill will destroy the private student-lending market.
Mr. Alexander, the Tennessee Republican, called the student-loan move "really brazen" and "the most underreported, biggest Washington takeover in history."
In classic game theory, confrontation is sometimes necessary when cooperation breaks down to present a credible potential threat and get the two sides to re-engage, said Robert Axelrod, a University of Michigan political scientist and author of the game-theory book, "The Evolution of Cooperation." He isn't related to White House senior adviser David Axelrod.
The Senate doesn't work the way game theorists think, said Antonia Ferrier, an aide to Republican Sen. Orrin Hatch of Utah. A body built on personal relationships is likely to spiral into endless tit-for-tat retaliations in the face of Mr. Obama's new turn, she said.
The new tone may be having an impact, though, among some Obama voters who had soured on what they saw as an electric campaigner gone soft.
Republicans are getting "better treatment than they deserve," said Don Miller, 68, a California independent and pipe line consultant who said his support for Mr. Obama was rising.
"He's not a politician yet, but he's learning fast. As he learns to work the Washington establishment he has become more and more effective," said James Shubert, 83, a transportation-services manager in Tennessee.
Robin Moyer, 48, a retired South Carolina school teacher, lamented that the president had been trying to "reach as many people as possible, but sometimes it is overkill."
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
36 comments:
I dont think no matter how much obama pushes the republicans to try to go with his bill they probably never will!
What exactly did the republicans expect to happen? Did they expect the president to remain passive in the face of their open belligerence. The olive branch has been extended, it has been rejected,and now for lack of a better term, "It's on." I personally think this will prove to be a long drawn out process that will cost many seats. An all out confrontation between the president and the senate is never productive, but both sides have to be dedicated to "bipartisanship"(if such a thing really exists) and the republicans are clearly not.
I agree that it's a very bad move to almost encourage republican anger and not deal with the issues upfront but bipartisanship is obviously not working. Obama cant do much more to please republicans than to just say go for it. The article states that republicans decided early on to oppose Obamas agenda. Considering their lack of cooperation, Don Miller is correct in saying that the "republicans are getting better treatment than they deserve."
In the end, the President should be able to work with Congress, not against it. All of our government is there to represent the people, and if one person is being hard headed against another, then aggression is going to occur. Of course Obama is going to come in swinging, he wants things done, and it isn't going to happen unless he pushes for it.
I think one of Obama's biggest faults this past year was trying to be too much of a team player. While I believe that this is an admirable quality in most cases, this is politics. I think it's great to listen to both sides of an argument, etc., and try to be balanced; at the same time, however, whenever you're in such an influential position, whenever you're the leader of a nation, there has to be a time when you say enough is enough, and I can't make everyone happy. I think Obama is finally starting to realizing this: that to be a great leader, sometimes you can't be a team player and make everyone happy, sometimes you just have to go with your gut, despite what others are saying or doing. That's what being a leader means.
I think this new "aggressive" tactic by President Obama is the correct way to handle to criticism toward the health-care bill. We need the President to be able to defend his policy and that is what he is doing.
First of all, it bothered me a whole lot that the reporter kept writing "Mr. Obama". It's either Mr. President or Obama or something... Anyway, I'm interested in how all of this will turn out. I could be terribly naive, but I just don't think Obama can single handedly, or the Democratic Party can... party handedly destroy a country so well constructed, like extremists are preaching. But I also just don't think that this is the right approach. From my perspective, it seems like their trying to shove things down our throat, and when we cough it back up, we've accomplished nothing. Why not try a more reasonable approach to fixing something? Even if only a little bit is improved at a time, it's better than being overly ambitious and failing miserably.
There comes a point to where people in any situtation have to push a little to be successful. Now there is a difference between aggresiveness and rage. Obama should be a little more careful on how far he takes his aggressiviness.
There comes a point to where people in any situtation have to push a little to be successful. Now there is a difference between aggresiveness and rage. Obama should be a little more careful on how far he takes his aggressiviness.
There comes a point to where people in any situtation have to push a little to be successful. Now there is a difference between aggresiveness and rage. Obama should be a little more careful on how far he takes his aggressiviness.
Every now and then people must push a little to be successful. Obama on the other hand such watch on how aggressive he gets. Being one of the leaders of the world he is an example of clear character and success. So maybe everyone is just over anyalizing his every action.
This whole partisan thing has become really frustrating to me. Now more than ever our government should unite as a front and be able to compromise party ideals to solve some of America's most pertinent problems.
It worries me greatly that obama is starting to bypass the senate. He is jumping the line that the checks and balances system is supposed to prevent. This is not the form of government our founding fathers created.
It's kind of refreshing to see Obama actually trying to accomplish something. Since he became president, he hasn't really followed through with any of his campaign promises. While it would be nice to have bipartisanship in government, the republicans have already made it clear they have no interest in anything Obama has to offer. If Obama wants to get anything accomplished he has to play the majority card. While I can understand the frustrations of the republican party at this tactic, that's how the game of politics is played, they'll have another chance in three years.
"go for it." Finally, at least there's somewhat progress, but it will probably end up having a delay, and then another...
To me it seems that they are presenting this political party conflict as an effect of Obama being in office. Political party conflict over issues has always been a problem and has always occured. and it will continue to happen as long as people have the ability to think and form opinions.
The statements in this article illustrate how destructive and divisive our party system can be. Like republican comment "When you have 40 Republicans, with your back against the wall and the gallows are right in your face, you're going to do your best to be unified," Mr. Alexander said. Instead of looking for compromise or trying to do what's best for te country republicans and democrats seem to on the whole be trying to do what's best for them and their party.
Can't we all just get along? Like Robin Moyer said, "the president had been trying to 'reach as many people as possible, but sometimes it is overkill.'" Republicans and Democrats need to find common ground on this issue before it gets even more out of hand.
Obama should have known this would happen when he signed the bill. This causes so much tention between the U.S. and it will take a long time to come back united.
You have to hand it to Obama he sure is serious about the health care bill. Despite what you may think of him or the bill you have to admire how stronglyy he defends it even in the face of great adversity. You also have to admire how stubborn the republicans are they are still fighting it no matter how futile their attempts are. I think the strong oppostion from both sides will make sure this bill is treated fairly.
The discussion and ultimate signing of the health care reform bill has highlighted the partisanship and differences between the democratic and republican parties. The divide came to the forefront.
President Obama finally realized that differences between two major parties were too large and he was unable to reach any compromise. Like any other leader in this situation, he went on attack and began using his trump card, his ability to speak. He also took advantage of being commander in chief and visited Afghanistan to show his support for our troops. In addition, he is effectively using legislative procedural means to his advantage. This is one of the political chess game at its best.
obama is a crimminal. For a guy who taught about the constitution, he knows little of it. Republicans need to take the house and shut this socialist down for good!
Its hard to say whether Obama's "agression" is a good thing or a bad thing. Of course, we don't want a quiet, shy president who is scared to put his ideas into action but we also don't want a leader pushing them on us.
I honestly believe that Obama is stuck in a lose-lose situation... the more assertive he becomes as a politician and as a president, the less he seems to be liked by the public. This stands as my own personal opinion however, and if he is actually receiving more support by following his personal agenda then kudos to him.
Without the cooperation of both parties the united states is doomed. Americans consist of democrats and republicans, and if they're expected to get along in every day life politicians should be able to make agreements and occasionaly meet each other half way.
Many people continue to look down upon Obama but they have to realize that he is our president and that's not going to change for a few more years. They might as well get used to it now.
Maybe it would be better if the Republicans and democrats had the same perspective on Obama's action-But that will never happen...
Obama Obama,he is basically not ready, he needs others to help him 24/7 n cant stand up for himself,but now that the guys that got his back are getting larger he is getting tougher all of a sudden.he is still way unexperienced even if he has learned alot since the beginning of his term.it took awhile for him to get started but now he is going to move way fast. i hate this health care bill,people have no choice towards it,what happened to the freedom in this country that the people supposely had?...
obama is coming really hard at the health-care bill. from trying to get each party to be on board with the bill, it shows that he'll step up and fight for what he believes will help.
I'm glad the health care bill finally passed and more change is being made. Of course there are positive as well as negative outcomes, however, only time can tell how these changes will truly affect America.
I think hes doing the right thing, and this cry for bipartisanship from republicans is just funny, they didn't cooperate and there is nothing left to do for Obama but to use the majority lead. I think Obama is just doing what people who voted for him expect him to do.
The Senate doesn't work the way game theorists think.
Its strange that the reporter keeps typing "Mr. Obama" and not "President Obama". The more I study politics, the more it becomes an endless cycle of each party trying to find a comeback to the other for some motion they've passed or bill they're promoting. It doesn't matter what party the president is associated with at the time he is in office, the other will do all it can to bring his party down. I think they should start working together to fix the country's problems and the problems of Nations around us instead of pouting and holding grudges like a bunch of preteen girls. Get over yourselves and move on. But I suppose that is easier said than done.
I think that if Mr. Obama gets more aggressive with Republicans, the republicans will get aggressive right back.
I think Mr. Obama really needs to try to get along with both parties if he wants anything to work. He needs to recognize both the democrats and the republicans. On another note i think it is good that Obama is finally taking a stand and actually being firm it is what a REAL president does.
I feel like this article is saying that Obama made the first move in the partisan war. However, I feel that the Republicans were argumentative from the start. It was like they were going to oppose anything he proposed just because he's a Democrat. Overall I think the game of politics is going on the way it always has.
Post a Comment