Here is more information about the Rwandan genocide that we have been looking at in class.
The Rwandan Genocide was the systematic murder of members of Rwanda's Tutsi minority and the moderates of its Hutu majority, in 1994. This was both the bloodiest period of the Rwandan Civil War and the worst genocide of the 1990s. With the preliminary implementation of the Arusha Accords, the Tutsi rebels and Hutu regime were able to agree to a cease-fire, and further negotiations were underway. The diplomatic efforts to end the conflict were at first thought to be successful, yet even with the MRND and RPF (political wing of the RPA) in talks, certain Hutu factions, like the CDR, were against any agreement for cooperation between the regime, and the rebels, to end Rwanda's ethnic and economic troubles and progress towards a stable nationhood. The genocide was primarily the action of two extremist Hutu militias, the Interahamwe (military wing of the MRND) and the Impuzamugambi (military wing of the CDR), against dissenters to their Hutu extremism. Over the course of about 100 days, from April 6 to mid-July, at least 500,000 Tutsis, and thousands of Hutus, were the victims of this atrocity.[1] Some estimates put the death toll around the 800,000 and 1,000,000 marks.[2] In February 2008, another estimate put the number of victims above 1,074,000.[3]
With the genocide, and the resurgence in the civil war, Rwanda's conflict was thought by the United Nations to be too volatile for it to handle. Eventually, the Tutsi rebels successfully brought the country under their control and overthrew the Hutu regime. Hundreds of thousands of Hutu refugees fled across the borders, mainly west to Zaire (now the Democratic Republic of the Congo). The presence of the extreme Hutu factions on the border with Rwanda was the cause for the First and Second Congo Wars, with clashes between these groups and the RPF's RPA, now part of a coalition force, even until today.[1] Rivalry between the Hutus and Tutsis is also central to the Burundian Civil War.
The UN's neglect of the Rwandan Genocide, under comprehensive media coverage, drew severe criticism. France, Belgium, and the United States in particular, received negative attention for their complacency towards the extreme Hutu regime's oppressions. Canada, Ghana, and the Netherlands, did continue to provide a force on the ground, under the command of Roméo Dallaire of the United Nations Assistance Mission for Rwanda (UNAMIR), but this mission had little actual power without support from the UN Security Council. Despite specific demands from UNAMIR's commanders in Rwanda, before and throughout the genocide, its requests for authorization to intervene were refused, and its capacity was even reduced.
With the genocide, and the resurgence in the civil war, Rwanda's conflict was thought by the United Nations to be too volatile for it to handle. Eventually, the Tutsi rebels successfully brought the country under their control and overthrew the Hutu regime. Hundreds of thousands of Hutu refugees fled across the borders, mainly west to Zaire (now the Democratic Republic of the Congo). The presence of the extreme Hutu factions on the border with Rwanda was the cause for the First and Second Congo Wars, with clashes between these groups and the RPF's RPA, now part of a coalition force, even until today.[1] Rivalry between the Hutus and Tutsis is also central to the Burundian Civil War.
The UN's neglect of the Rwandan Genocide, under comprehensive media coverage, drew severe criticism. France, Belgium, and the United States in particular, received negative attention for their complacency towards the extreme Hutu regime's oppressions. Canada, Ghana, and the Netherlands, did continue to provide a force on the ground, under the command of Roméo Dallaire of the United Nations Assistance Mission for Rwanda (UNAMIR), but this mission had little actual power without support from the UN Security Council. Despite specific demands from UNAMIR's commanders in Rwanda, before and throughout the genocide, its requests for authorization to intervene were refused, and its capacity was even reduced.
Government leaders met in secret with youth group leaders, forming and arming militias called Interahamwe (meaning "Those who stand (fight, kill) together" in Kinyarwanda and Impuzamugambi (meaning "Those who have the same (or a single) goal").[citations needed]
On January 11, 1994 Lieutenant General Roméo Dallaire (UN Force Commander in Rwanda) notified Military Advisor to the Secretary-General, Major-General Maurice Baril of four major weapons caches and plans by the Hutus for extermination of Tutsis. The telegram from Dallaire stated that an informant who was a top level Interahamwe militia trainer was in charge of demonstrations carried out a few days before. The goal of the demonstrations was to provoke an RPF battalion in Kigali into firing upon demonstrators and Belgian United Nations Assistance Mission for Rwanda (UNAMIR) troops into using force. Under such a scenario the Interhamwe would have an excuse to engage the Belgian troops and the RPF battalion. Several Belgians were to be killed, which would guarantee a withdrawal of the Belgian contingent. According to the informant 1,700 Interhamwe militiamen were trained in Governmental Forces camps and he was ordered to register all the Kigali Tutsis. Dallaire made immediate plans for UNAMIR troops to seize the arms caches and advised UN Headquarters of his intentions, believing these actions lay within his mission's mandate. The following day headquarters stated in another cable that the outlined actions went beyond the mandate granted to UNAMIR under Security Council Resolution 872. Instead, President Habyarimana was to be informed of possible Arusha Accords violations and the discovered concerns and report back on measures taken. The January 11 telegram later played an important role in discussion about what information was available to the United Nations prior to the genocide.[10]
The killing was well organized.[11] By the time the killing started, the militia in Rwanda was 30,000 strong — one militia member for every ten families — and organized nationwide, with representatives in every neighborhood. Some militia members were able to acquire AK-47 assault rifles by completing requisition forms. Other weapons, such as grenades, required no paperwork and were widely distributed. Many members of the Interahamwe and Impuzamugambi were armed only with machetes, but these were some of the most effective killers.[citation needed]
Rwandan Prime Minister Jean Kambanda revealed, in his testimony before the International Criminal Tribunal, that the genocide was openly discussed in cabinet meetings and that "one cabinet minister said she was personally in favor of getting rid of all Tutsi; without the Tutsi, she told ministers, all of Rwanda's problems would be over."[12] In addition to Kambanda, the genocide's organizers included Colonel Théoneste Bagosora, a retired army officer, and many top ranking government officials and members of the army, such as General Augustin Bizimungu. On the local level, the Genocide's planners included Burgomasters, or mayors, and members of the police.
On January 11, 1994 Lieutenant General Roméo Dallaire (UN Force Commander in Rwanda) notified Military Advisor to the Secretary-General, Major-General Maurice Baril of four major weapons caches and plans by the Hutus for extermination of Tutsis. The telegram from Dallaire stated that an informant who was a top level Interahamwe militia trainer was in charge of demonstrations carried out a few days before. The goal of the demonstrations was to provoke an RPF battalion in Kigali into firing upon demonstrators and Belgian United Nations Assistance Mission for Rwanda (UNAMIR) troops into using force. Under such a scenario the Interhamwe would have an excuse to engage the Belgian troops and the RPF battalion. Several Belgians were to be killed, which would guarantee a withdrawal of the Belgian contingent. According to the informant 1,700 Interhamwe militiamen were trained in Governmental Forces camps and he was ordered to register all the Kigali Tutsis. Dallaire made immediate plans for UNAMIR troops to seize the arms caches and advised UN Headquarters of his intentions, believing these actions lay within his mission's mandate. The following day headquarters stated in another cable that the outlined actions went beyond the mandate granted to UNAMIR under Security Council Resolution 872. Instead, President Habyarimana was to be informed of possible Arusha Accords violations and the discovered concerns and report back on measures taken. The January 11 telegram later played an important role in discussion about what information was available to the United Nations prior to the genocide.[10]
The killing was well organized.[11] By the time the killing started, the militia in Rwanda was 30,000 strong — one militia member for every ten families — and organized nationwide, with representatives in every neighborhood. Some militia members were able to acquire AK-47 assault rifles by completing requisition forms. Other weapons, such as grenades, required no paperwork and were widely distributed. Many members of the Interahamwe and Impuzamugambi were armed only with machetes, but these were some of the most effective killers.[citation needed]
Rwandan Prime Minister Jean Kambanda revealed, in his testimony before the International Criminal Tribunal, that the genocide was openly discussed in cabinet meetings and that "one cabinet minister said she was personally in favor of getting rid of all Tutsi; without the Tutsi, she told ministers, all of Rwanda's problems would be over."[12] In addition to Kambanda, the genocide's organizers included Colonel Théoneste Bagosora, a retired army officer, and many top ranking government officials and members of the army, such as General Augustin Bizimungu. On the local level, the Genocide's planners included Burgomasters, or mayors, and members of the police.
20 comments:
Anjelica Savedra
4th period
9th grade
The conflict between the Tutsis and the Hutus was very bad in many ways because some people died and some people where innocent but the bad ones where not and they deserved it. The genocide to the UN was going to be handle and all the media cause more conflict to Rwandan. The police and mayors where with the genocide and inclued most of the people with the power.
This was so aweful. I feel terrible that no one tried to help them. In the movie, I wanted to start crying and i felt ashamed that no other country came to their rescue. And the video filmer in the movie was right when he said that people will see it at dinner and say what a terrible thing it was but then keep on eating dinner becasue that is what people really do. We don't always offer our hands in support when it doesn't have some way of tying itself back to them. It is so aweful that people have to be so cruel.
Sarah Lambert
Human Geography AP 4
9th grade
So I've always planned to spend time in Anahuac, Mexico doing mission work in college. But after watching Hotel Rwanda again, and reading that, I kind of want to spend that time in Africa. Everything about that movie and that article, well it makes me sick. But it really makes me want to help people. I'm inspired.
Wow. That movie in class was hard to watch. And to think the world just stood back and watched the battle. makes me sick... I didn't quite understand if that general was in trouble or not. Please explain in class:)! If i was the captain of the U.N. i would have just shot everybody instead of just whippin it out and flashin it around...
I've seen "Hotel Rwanda" in class and I definietely think that it's a amazing movie. I think that both sides are to blame because I'm guessing that the same actions were being played on both side. The UN should pay more attention to the nations that need it the most and not do it because of race. After all we are the United Nations and everyone is a part of that.
Jiaqi Niu
HuGeo 4th
10th Grade
I guess you really can't say that there was a good or bad side. Both the Hutu and Tutsi destroyed the others peoples. But after watching some of "Hotel Rwanda" i'm influenced to choose sides. Its pretty sad that only the UN helped, but it was only protection for our own country.
I think seeing Egypt next year would be the BEST THING EVER!!!
Celesta Nave
10th grade
HuGeo4
I have a quick question, in the movie if all the European people were being evacuated then why did the UN peace keepers stay there or were the people allowed the choice to stay there?
I hope they were staying there because they were just good people. It would make me feel better if it was so.
Sarah Lambert
HUman Geography Ap 4
9th period
Abigail Ham
4th period
Humanity is shameful.
Keti Tsereteli
Period 4
Grade 10
Human Geography
Humans have been prone to racial stereotypes, and in history, we have witnessed many massacres, yet it never ceases to amaze me how desperately people try to elevate themselves above others, even if inhumane means are necessary. Incredulously, those in power, whose job it is to protect the country and its people, follow their own greedy paths and even encourage the genocide of their own people. How do people see themselves as so far above those who have darker skin, or larger heads, or larger noses, when they themselves lack the most important of all qualities: the ability to see with an open view? What could possibly go through their heads when they crush the take the lives of innocent men, women, and children, but a pure hate of those that are different than them. But if you go deeper, you can find jealousy at what the other has the they don't, uncertainty of the future with those that are not like them, and worst of all, fear of those unknown to them. That trepidation stems from the human characteristic to cling to that which we know, and disregard, even grow to fear everything else. Although that angst is magnified by tenfold in order for one to actually cross the line of murder, or genocide, the aforesaid lies at the core of many acts of gruteque actions.
I REALLY LOVED THE MOVIE HOTEL ROWANDA! it is very interesting how to groups of people that are very close to being the same can hate each so much! it was interesting to see all that had happened their! it brought me back down to earth and show me that not everything isn't as good as it is in america! i didn't really understand what started the whole war thing though. but i did enjoy the movie very much! it was also interesting to see how people that had more money could get along and live another day for a small fee of some sort!!
Ashely Ambrosio
4th
This was a great movie! But the fact that it is based on a true story really stinks. I asked a couple people like my parents and friends if they had ever heard of the Hutu and Tutsi war in Africa and most of them didn't even know what I was talking about. Then I asked them if they had ever seen Hotel Rwanda, and most of them finally knew what I was talkin about, which is pretty sad if you think about it. Like they said in the movie, many Americans don't really care about anybody else as long as it doesn't affect themselves.
Jessica Kaskie
Human Geo -4
I actually watched Hotel Rwanda today, and it was gruesome. That whole thing was terrible.
Genocide sucks
-Daniel Moss
2nd
Not only was the genocide a horrible terror, but the fact that basically the entire world ignored the civil war made it even worse.
After reading your additional facts over the Rwandan genocide it's hard to believe that it was not made much more public to the rest of the world at the time. I'm glad that Hotel Rwanda opened more eyes to what had happened.
Unfortunately, Africa and other places will most likely always be war-torn, but hopefully the Hutu and Tutsi conflict will never reoccur, and if it does hopefully more help will be offered.
The movie was really hard to watch..I literally had to turn around in some of the parts. I felt bad when i found out at the end of the movie it was a true story...=] But it defeltly had an impact on me...
This movie really shows the reality of what goes on outside of America. Most people do not realize just how much cruel and inhuman stuff happens in the present day.
Johanna Bauersfeld
4th period
(The previous comment was from me,
i was signed in to my friend's account.)
That was a really disturbing movie, but I think it was necessary for people to see, especially students. I was already aware of the Rwanda Genocide and had been shocked at how many others didn't. I find it ridiculous that if one American dies oversees due to racism or prejudice, its a national ordeal, but we, as a country, are completly blind to what can be compared to a second holocaust.
Grant Curry
Human Geography
4th Period
9th Grade
Why does history constantly repeat itself? why do we make the same mistakes over and over without ever learning? Hotel Rwanda is sad and reminds me just how cruel the world can be.
yeah... this makes me sick. it's awful that they couldn't get the help they needed...
:[
I think its sad that during the Tutsis and Hutus war the U.N and America just ignored the genocide. I probably would not have even known about this if we had not gone over it in class. America needs to pay closer attention to countries like Rwanda so we can at try to stop something like this from happening or at the very least we can render aid to those caught in the war.
4th period
Post a Comment