Tuesday, March 30, 2010

RNC Fires Staffer for Bar Expense


A Republican National Committee staffer who accompanied a group of young donors to a bondage-themed West Hollywood club and then expensed the nearly $2,000 tab has been fired by the committee, POLITICO has learned.

RNC chief of staff Ken McKay announced the firing in an internal committee e-mail obtained by POLITICO.

"This was not an RNC-sanctioned event and was not associated in any way with any RNC official event,” McKay wrote of the February outing to Voyeur, a West Hollywood club modeled after the risqué Tom Cruise-Nicole Kidman movie “Eyes Wide Shut.”

The late-night excursion followed an official RNC event in Los Angeles for donors in its “Young Eagles” program, McKay wrote, stressing that neither Chairman Michael Steele nor any senior staff were aware of either the outing or the committee’s reimbursement of the cost.

McKay wrote that the fired staffer, who is not named in the e-mail, “was aware that this activity was not eligible for reimbursement and had been previously counseled on this very subject. Accordingly, that staff person has been terminated.”

McKay also wrote that the donor who was reimbursed for footing the bill at Voyeur, Erik Brown, “has verbally agreed to repay the funds to the RNC.”

A source with knowledge of the situation said Brown, a churchgoing, midlevel political operative, “was not entirely thrilled with the venue that people ended up at” but nonetheless agreed to foot the bill after the RNC staffer in question told him the committee would reimburse the cost.

The RNC’s February Federal Election Commission report shows a $1,946.25 reimbursement to Brown, the owner of an Orange County direct-mail firm that has worked for top GOP candidates and committees, for “meals” at Voyeur.

The RNC, which came under fire earlier this month after POLITICO revealed an inflammatory fundraising presentation, has been doing damage control on the bondage story since The Daily Caller reported the expenditure Monday morning.

It emphasized that Steele did not attend and was unaware of the post-event foray to Voyeur and announced an investigation into how the reimbursement, which the source said violated RNC policy because the expense was not connected to an official event, slipped through accounting procedures.

In a statement Monday night, RNC spokesman Doug Heye said, “The committee has taken appropriate steps to address the issues relating to the reimbursement of certain expenses,” including “personnel actions” and revisions of “accounting and reimbursement processes ... to ensure that such an action cannot reoccur.”

Seeking to quell mounting discontent from some donors already unhappy with reports of lavish travel spending by Steele, Heye said, “We recognize the difficulty [the Voyeur] incident has caused and assure our members and supporters that any necessary and proper remediation is being implemented immediately.”

Of Brown, Heye said, “It is unfortunate that a loyal GOP donor who has recruited other donors became involved in this incident while merely trying to help what turned out to be the improper request of a staffer who is no longer with the committee.”

Brown could not be reached for comment, but Rebecca Schoenkopf, a liberal California blogger who co-hosted a now-defunct radio talk show with Brown, said he struck her as “just too uptight” to direct folks to a club like Voyeur.

He is “just a hell of a sweet guy,” Schoenkopf said.

And Leif Larson, the head of the Washington office for Brown’s firm, Dynamic Marketing Inc., or DMI, called Brown “a good husband” who is religious and is “strongly in favor of fiscal conservatism.”

Larson also said he’s concerned Brown’s ensnarement in the Voyeur controversy could hurt the firm’s business.

FEC filings show that federal campaigns and committees — including committees associated with 2008 GOP presidential candidates John McCain, Mitt Romney and Rudy Giuliani — have paid DMI $161,200 since 2006. However, Larson said the bulk of the firm’s business is for California state candidates and committees.

The Hill newspaper reported Monday night that California state Rep. Chuck DeVore, who's seeking the GOP nomination for U.S. Senate, announced Monday he "has severed all ties" with DMI.

In an online biography, Brown described himself as “a sportsman and a mentor to young athletes,” and an “ice hockey coach for over 12 years,” and indicated that he and his wife “are actively involved in the ministries of their local church.”

He also boasted via Twitter of his access to Steele, tweeting in October that he was “enjoying the football game with RNC Chairman Michael Steele. (Eagles vs. Redskins at FedEx Field).”

39 comments:

Anabel Reid 4 said...

I think that if you spend any company or organization's money without their consent( employee or not), that you should be repremanded in some way. I guess in this case they saw it fit to fire the employee.

wilsonvillegas8 said...

I think this just shows just how much the Tea Party has afflicted the Republican party. Conservative values have turned into a GOP leisure spree. It just makes me wonder what tabs paid with donor money don't make it to public record.

Dawson Land 8th Period said...

I'm not sure what the issue is here. I don't know what other opinion anyone could have other than: " I can't believe someone would be stupid enough to use funds donated to the Republican Party to go to a risque strip club, and expect to get away with it. " It's actually really funny to me that he wasn't terminated the first time he misused donated money on "this very subject". Haha.

Marissa Castillo 3 said...

bahahahhaha this is one of the funniest things I have ever heard! I mean really how stupid can you be, to take that money to a place like that and think it won't be a big deal because you are only a politian Please!

RobertDuran4 said...

I do not think that RNC funds should have been used to pay for the strip club bills but I don't think anyone should have been fired for going to strip clubs either. I don't see why everyone makes such a big deal about important high profile peoples private lives.

LucianoAguero8 said...

Well, they fired a hell of a sweet guy, but it was the right decision. The RNC should not be sending the message that they don't pay their debts back to their supporters.

WendyKissko1st said...

The fact that the staffers expected their outing to be reinbursed is ridiculous. They completely deserve to be fired if they believe that kind of behavior is professional. Brown also should have to pay back to the company what he was reinbursed for. Hopefully this incident will cause other companies to look at how their employees are spending their money, and changes will be made.

Anabel Reid 4 said...

I think that anyone who uses any company's money ( whether they are an employee or not) unlawfully and without the comapny's knowledge and consent, should face consequences. I do not think that the company was out of line for firing this employye.

BrittanyBurks 8th said...

I think that the employee deserved to be let go. The article says he had been warned about the matter before yet still put himself and others in a comprimising position then asked the RNC for reinbbursment for it.(having already made someone else foot the actual bill) He should have known better and as such he paid the conquences for his actions.

EthanEarl3 said...

Ahhh... The political scandal du jour. One day it's ACORN being caught on hidden camera helping a "pimp" (actually just a man in a disguise) keep his escort business hidden from the government, the next it's the RNC covering a tab at a bondage club. I'm just looking forward to SNL's jokes about it on Weekend Update.

Stephen Garcia_3rd said...

It's just absurd that a political official would use party funds to take people to a strip club. This action should in no way be condoned and I feel that the RNC took appropriate actions in terminating his association with them. It's despicable that people do this sort of thing, and I feel that it should be brought to the media's attention in every instance.

AmandaOlivarez3 said...

There comes a point to where people in any situtation have to push a little to be successful. Now there is a difference between aggresiveness and rage. Obama should be a little more careful on how far he takes his aggressiviness.

Katharine Glasheen 3rd said...

hah. it's good that the RNC is taking the right choice here by being transparent about their funds. I'm sure the guy that spent the money is pretty embarassed now.

Sarah Steinmeier Period 8 said...

This unfortunate and inappropriate series of events has been a public relations disaster for the RNC. The committee's statement that this incident merely slipped through the accounting cracks is concerning, for it implies that the RNC is not in complete control of its finances and operation.

JacobKirksey8 said...

Politics is all about the money. The fact is that the rnc (and dnc) have superfluous amounts of money in which they can do whatever they want to do with. I'm sure there are worse things than "erotic art institutes" that the parties do with their supporters' money. You gotta love politics

BethanyRatliff3 said...

This is ridiculous. When you are involved in politics or anything to do with being in the public eye, obviously everything you do will be made known. Don't expect to hide your late night escapades. And a 2000 dollar tab? Really?

DavidHinojosa4 said...

This is so dumb they are really getting this upset over some money to get reimbursed. They need to keep track of spending and what's going on way better so things like this dont happen often. Everyone should have somewhat of a limit on what can be spent. Just do this doesn't happen often keep track of spending and company funding and spending.

timothyyoes4 said...

yeah that guy should have been fired and then been forced to make a formal apology. His behavior was ridiculous and he should not have put that on the committees bill. They took direct and immediate action so i agree that donors should still continue to back the committee.

KimberAdcock1 said...

I don't think it was right to fire him expecially since he was probably told to go so they could get more votes even though they said it had nothing to do with them. They could have suspended him so we knew an action had been takin place. But fireing him I think was taking it too far

NatalieChapman1 said...

Taking republican lobyist to a strip club to ensure that they will endorse their canditates is as little as your can get. If that is what it takes to get money for an election then that offer should be surpassed because it dosnt show the morality of what politics should be today.

clarissabaker3 said...

I don't know how this ever sounded like a good idea knowing the amount of attention and press politics inevitably draws. The republican party is going to have to do weeks of damage control for one mans mistake and it will still change some peoples minds permenantly.

jocelynkennedy3 said...

I feel like we most likely don't have the whole story but i still feel that this was an awful choice for the staffer. He knew the RNC wasn't going to pay for it but he still charged the outing. This also sets a bad example to the "Young Eagles" who were treated to this event. The club was not an appropriate setting for a political event. The Republican National Committee's name was tagged onto this event and the club venue is not a proffesional setting.

katie.pattillo8 said...

I think they just fired him to make them look better because these expenses got out to the public. And conservative people frown upon these types of things.

Anonymous said...

Fact is he did a wrong thing and he payed for it. It shouldn't matter how good or bad a citizen you are, it's a basic principle of punishment. I understand that even the nicest of people have their mistakes, but he did a wrong thing and he was punished. Whether he was punished in the right way is a different story. But I think it just shows that anybody can get caught doing a bad thing and that thing has it's consequences.

Laura Xu 8th said...

This unidentified staffer should have known better than to take a group of donors to a bondage club and then ask for reimbursement. According to this article, he was told that "this activity was not eligible for reimbursement." This private meeting, however, apparently didn't mention the fact that he shouldn't be taking donors to a bondage club in the first place. It's a good thing that he has been fired, and maybe he'll be replaced by someone with a little more common sense.

Jamila said...

This article mentions Brown as being religious and church going at least three times. Leif Larson said that Brown was religious. Another part of the artical says, "Brown, a churchgoing, midlevel political operative". Another part says that Brown described himself as, "actively involved in the ministries of their local church” with his wife.
Who cares if Brown is religious? Is that supposed to make it slightly more acceptable? Are there people sitting around saying "That was pretty bad, but it would be worse if he was an atheist"? If anything the highlighting of his faith just makes him look like somewhat of a hyporite. It says to me that he believes in Christian values, and then pays for people going to lesbian bondage themed strip clubs (at least they serve dinner).

Jamila said...

Oh, I'm sorry instead of lesbian bondage themed strip club, I should have said Lesbian bondage themed art venue.

Katie Beth Gallagher 1 said...

This is really crazy and I find it hard to believe no senior staff was involved with this. I think the staffer was either told to take the donors to Voyeur or it was strongly hinted at by some of the staff. It's also hard to understand why, if they had addressed this with the staffer and advised him not to take the donors to Voyeur, did he even bother to try to get reimbursement. This sounds like one staffer just doing what he was told but getting screwed by the RNC trying to save its reputation.

Abigail Nebb said...

i love how Brown is called a good husband and fiscally conservative yet spends 2500 at a strip club

AllieHogan8 said...

I think that firing the RNC staffer was the right thing to do. He should have known that taking young donors, or anyone for that matter, to a bondage club was not any cost that the RNC would reimburse. Erik Brown should not be blamed for the staffer being fired.

SamanthaDeLaCerda3 said...

hahah wow, seriously, if you want to go to a strip bar then by all means go. but dont be stupid enough to try and get the money back by reimbursment i mean come on people. get real

KateKobza8 said...

The RNC has every right to fire a staff member who took a group of donors to a club expecting a reimbursement, when he was aware that the activity wouldn’t be reimbursed, and making another man foot the bill. In addition, the RNC chairman and senior staff were unaware the gathering at the club was even going on.

Anonymous said...

I love how absolutely hilarious this situation is. Republican finances being used at a bondage strip club (or, as is now politically correct, an erotic art institute) sounds like a SNL spoof. The fact that this is really happening is frankly amusing. And also somewhat disconcerting. Government money, you are put to such great use.

MatthewAdame3 said...

I think it's ridiculous that this guy actually thought it'd be appropriate to take these people to the bar in an attempt to get their money. And then to expect to be reimbursed for it is even more crazy. Some people lack even the most common sense nowadays

constanceschmitz-mousavi4 said...

I find this hysterical... but I also laughed through Requiem For A Dream. I want to know exactly what all the money went to, that'd be a good laugh. The fact that it was a "bondage-themed" club modeled after a Tom Cruise movie is the best though; Cruise is a joke by himself. But I think the very best part over this article was “was aware that this activity was not eligible for reimbursement and had been previously counseled on this very subject."

constanceschmitz-mousavi4 said...

I hope the my other comment posted...and on time. The page times out every time I click publish. =[

Andy Salazar 8th said...

FEC filings show that federal campaigns and committees — including committees associated with 2008 GOP presidential candidates John McCain, Mitt Romney and Rudy Giuliani — have paid DMI $161,200 since 2006.

Anabel Reid 4 said...

I think that any person( employee or not) that spends a company's money without their consent should face some sort of consequence. I am not sure of details in this occasion, but firing this employee does not seem to be too harsh of an action taken on the company's part.

zakarybalderas4th said...

Wow, a $2000 bar tab. That is just embarassing. Seriouly, what goes through some people's mind when they do stupid things like that, probally nothing. Five stars for stupid politicians.