Wednesday, May 12, 2010
Texas Entertains Legalizing Gambling to Make Up Budget Woes
An expansion of gambling has been suggested as Texas faces a projected shortfall that some lawmakers say could hit $18 billion.
Republican Speaker Joe Straus told House budget writers Tuesday that they'll have to handle a state shortfall of at least $11 billion without new taxes, but he raised the possibility of unpaid furloughs and four-day workweeks for state workers.
"Increasing taxes would restrain economic growth and hinder our ability to create jobs," Straus said at a meeting of the House Appropriations Committee. "Come next session, I'm confident that we can make thoughtful, responsible decisions to balance our budget, but this will require tough choices, significant cuts in some areas and perhaps totally new thinking in others."
Texas' current budget is more than $182 billion in state and federal dollars. The biggest chunks of spending are on education and health care.
The budget shortfall, which officials said Tuesday could be as high as $18 billion, is largely a result of the national recession. It's the projected difference between available revenue, mostly from lower-than-expected sales taxes, and the cost of maintaining services at their current levels. The state's Rainy Day Fund is expected to have a balance of about $8.2 billion.
"Because so much of our general revenue budget goes to personnel, I hope that you will find creative ways to contain personnel costs and limit payroll growth," Straus told the committee. "You might consider the impact of freezing higher-level salaries or limiting new hires to only those essential to the public safety and welfare of our citizens."
He said Texas must look at what other states are doing to handle budget shortfalls, including unpaid furloughs and four-day workweeks.
Straus also mentioned imposing a moratorium on all new programs and services that require state money and a prohibition on issuing state bonds because of the ongoing cost associated with debt.
"I'm not advocating for any one of these choices, in particular, but I do know that every cost savings idea must be on the table."
Later during the meeting, committee Chairman Jim Pitts, R-Waxahachie, said legalized gambling would be a possible option.
"I just tell it like it is," he said. "It will be helping us in the future and with what we've heard today we will continually be needing revenue in the state of Texas."
Lt. Gov. Dewhurst and Gov. Rick Perry both say they oppose any expansion of gambling in Texas.
Dewhurst, who presides over the Senate, spent his first session in the office facing a $10 billion budget shortfall in 2003.
"This is not my first rodeo," Dewhurst told The Associated Press Tuesday. "I went through it in 2003 and it was a lot tougher in 2003 than it's going to be in 2011. Our challenge in 2011 is to cover the dollars that went into the 2009 budget from the federal stimulus and the previous balances that we used, plus any shortfalls that we have in our revenue estimate.
"I think we're in pretty good shape," he said.
Dewhurst said with more money in the Rainy Day Fund, axing one-time items that were funded in 2009, payments from the state's Available School Fund that were not available last year and improvement in the economy would help ease the pain.
Dewhurst did agree with Straus' assessment that the federal health care overhaul will only exacerbate the state's budgetary woes.
"Over the next few years, Texans will face higher federal income taxes and other increases in federal levies, including for Social Security and Medicare as result of the federal health care reforms," Straus said. "Our work on the budget will begin in an environment of uncertainty as the federal government grapples with spending and tax measures to reduce the federal debt. This makes it even more imperative that the state of Texas cover its budget shortfall without a tax increase."
State agencies have submitted proposals to cut current-year budgets by 5 percent at the behest of Perry, Dewhurst and Straus. But those savings will only amount to about $1.7 billion, officials have said.
"The 5 percent that we requested was just the beginning," Straus said. "It was absolutely necessary but not nearly sufficient."
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
19 comments:
Texas could also lower the legal gambling age while it's at it.
Personally, I say we leave Texas the way it is. Casinos belong in the states that they are presently in, and Texas has enough big cities and attractions; we really don't need to add another industry. I'm sure that this can't be the only way to fix our failing budget.
Well, we have to get money back into Texas, I don't know why they don't expand gambling, lottery tickets have helped education.
It would be a good way to gain money without raising taxes and putting the nation in more debt.
hmm i don't really think gambling is a way to go and i think that will just cause a lot of controversy. We don't really need more...
hmm i don't really think gambling is a way to go and i think that will just cause a lot of controversy. We don't really need more...
Legalizing gambling seems to be the easy way out in dealing with our budget. When it comes to our finances it should be a matter of looking at our spending and whats best for us and the economy in the long run not a band-aid fix that will help right now but cause problems in the future.
Honestly the gambling wouldnt be all to bad of an idea to raise the money needed and not hindering the economy as much as it would be without the needed money
I think legalizing gambling would be a good way to stimulate the Texas economy and bring in "tourists" from neighboring states.
I think expanding gambling is a good option but not the only one. It is reliable because no matter what turns the economy takes people can always find money to gamble but it is certainly not the only option.
I don't know about legalizing gambling in Texas. Unless we were about to go through the Great Depression economic situation again then I wouldn't legalize the gambling. Representatives who have been there for many years are saying that we can get through this because we've had tougher times. Plus, gambling would just make more people who were fine go into debt. Not saying that all people would, but those who do it irressponsibly and then we have more people without homes... It's jsut not a win situation for me.
I think it will have its advantages and disadvantages.
Education and health care are the top priorities for every spending budget and I believe that this plan could help Texas with their budget shortfall. Since increasing taxes would not have a good outcome for the people of Texas, I think this could be the only option.
I believe if gambling was legalized in Texas it's budget could be balanced. Gambling is a great part of the economy in the United States and to incorporate it into this state would cancel the economy's shortcomings.
I think in this situation it would be good for Texas to legalize gambling. The state would be able to gain more money without raising taxes.
This plan might help the budget but workers are not going to like having a four day work week because that will mean less pay which could hurt them and increase the poverty level.
i think that these budget shortages is going to cause the poverty level to increase because people wont be able to work as many hours as they want!
raising the taxes to help with the shortages could help with that but could severely hurt the workers
Many states are now being creative and come up with ideas to pay their debts and raise money for their state. By allowing gambling to be legalized, it creates a good revenue and opens new jobs.
Post a Comment