Thursday, September 23, 2010

Is New Tea Party Ad "Race Baiting"

WASHINGTON – A little-known congressional candidate from North Carolina has released a television advertisement that calls the planned Muslim community center in New York City a “victory mosque” and associates it with terrorists.

Renee Ellmers, a tea party advocate and Republican challenger in the 2nd Congressional District, began running the ad Wednesday morning on cable channels throughout the district. She is taking on U.S. Rep. Bob Etheridge, a seven-term incumbent considered a moderate-to-conservative Democrat.

The ad’s script echoes the words of many conservative commentators in recent months who complained about Park51, the Muslim community center being planned two blocks from the site of the former World Trade Center.

In the ad a male narrator, his voice backed by an ominous music score, says Muslims built “victory mosques” after conquering Jerusalem, Cordoba and Constantinople in the early A.D.’s.

“And now, they want to build a mosque at Ground Zero,” the narrator says.

Then Ellmers appears on the video. “The terrorists haven’t won, and we should tell them in plain English, ‘No, there will never be a mosque at Ground Zero,’” she says.

The ad says Etheridge “won’t take a stand” on the community center.

In an interview, Ellmers said the planned mosque is relevant in North Carolina.

“One of the interesting things we’ve found in talking to people in District 2 is they’re overwhelmingly concerned about and against the mosque being built in New York,” Ellmers said. “I think it’s a very serious issue.”

In response, Etheridge campaign spokesman Mike Davis said Ellmers “is desecrating hallowed ground” and distracting voters with her ad.

“Bob Etheridge has never thought building this mosque and community center so close to Ground Zero is a good idea,” Davis said in his statement.

Ellmers pounced back, saying it was her ad that prompted Etheridge’s public skepticism of the Park51 project.

“Why did it take him so long to say that?” she asked.

Davis acknowledged that Etheridge has never offered his opinion publicly, but said that’s because “he’s not going to get involved in it. … That decision is for New York.”

The ad began running Wednesday morning on CNN and Fox News, Ellmers said. Her campaign consultant, Carter Wrenn, said it likely will run about a week. He would not disclose the amount the campaign is spending.

As of June 30, the last time campaigns had to disclose their finances, Ellmers had raised less than $190,000 and had about $46,000 on hand. Etheridge had raised $909,000 and had about $417,000 on hand.

Ebrahim Moosa, an associate professor of Islamic studies at Duke University, corrected the ad’s assumptions about “victory mosques,” saying Ellmers’ ad perpetuates disinformation about Islam.

“All conquering nations built temples, churches and mosques whenever they arrived in new territories,” Moosa said. “But these were not ‘victory’ shrines, but rather testaments of faith. Claims that Muslims have built victory mosques in Jerusalem or Cordoba are sheer flights of fancy with no historical testimony to support it.”

Within hours of being posted on Ellmers’ site, the ad was all over political blogs, receiving attention from Capitol Hill newspapers and cable news networks. A separate version of the ad, on YouTube, encouraged viewers to contribute to Ellmers’ campaign.

“Did we think we might get some national attention? Yeah, we thought this might strike a nerve,” Ellmers said.

A blogger at the left-leaning Salon.com, Justin Elliott, called it the “most baldly anti-Muslim ad of the year.”

Ellmers disagreed.

“This is the anti-Muslim card that they’re going to pull out,” she said. “Well, I’m not anti-Muslim. As a nurse, I’ve taken care of people of all races, creeds and colors and respected all their traditions. What I am is pro-American.”

Wrenn, who consulted for U.S. Sen. Jesse Helms, said several years ago he regretted the race-baiting ads that Helms ran in his races in the 1980s and ‘90s.

But Wednesday, Wrenn said he doesn’t see Ellmers’ ad in the same light.

“No,” he said. “I think it’s just absolutely wrong to say, ‘Well, if you’re opposed to putting a mosque at Ground Zero, you’re a bigot.’ That’s playing the race card in reverse.”

A YouTube video surfaced this summer showing Etheridge grabbing a young man who tried to question him with a video camera on a Capitol Hill sidewalk. Etheridge, clearly angry, was seen repeatedly asking the man, “Who are you?” and holding his arm.

Etheridge apologized for his actions, but Ellmers has not made much of the video politically.

Ellmers said Wednesday she has recorded one other political advertisement, though -- a repudiation of Etheridge’s voting record in Congress.

That ad, she said, has not yet been released.


16 comments:

jordanpharr1 said...

I dont agree with muslim beliefs and I am like ellmers,I'm not racist im pro-american. It is very dirrespectful for them to do that especially since they chose to live here instead of the country that did this to us. They are taking a big risk by building this and many innocent people have died because of 9/11 and I for one would not want that there if I lost family due to that. I dont want it there because of the fact that its a slap to the face for amercians.

Lia McInerney2 said...

Oh my goodness. Seriously, have these Tea Party people NOT read the Constitution? They don't even have to read all of it to know that by saying Muslims can't build an Islamic community center two block away from Ground Zero violates the 1st Amendment. The freedom to practice ANY religion. That's what this country was based upon. They say they're 'restoring' honor and liberty and stuff? Well, I think they missed something. They are bigots who shouldn't be in the government system.

maryobriant001 said...

I find the use of scare tactics and half-truths in the election process incredibly annoying. The only issues that make it into the news are those that are sensational, and the truly important information about actual issues is not given to the public. I respect Etheridge for not responding in kind to Ellmers' innaccurate and irrelevant ad campaign, but would not be surprised if he did so eventually. This situation is actually very similar to Governor Perry's fixation on challenger White's tax returns Perry demands White display in return for a debate- is this really necessary? The answer is most definitely no.

NicholasCurry said...

Let me tell you,
I love when politicians get involved in random issues to try and muster support.
ITS MY FAVORITE.
But really, its not.
The news, which is already tedious enough, becomes even more aggravating when you read first about a political party, second about an "important" issue, and third about that political party's view on that important issue.

AllysonSadegur5th said...

I believe that Ellmers should not have made the ad. The way that she presented it makes it seem that she "hates" Muslims and that she doesn't want them to do what they technically have the right to do. In reality, she can't really make them not put a mosque up with all the freedoms guaranteed to the people in the U.S. I think that this ad is more her trying to round up other people who also disapprove of the mosque being built, so that they can protest it. I don't believe that one should be built that close to Ground Zero just out of respect for what happened, but I also don't think they should build a church either.

AllysonSadegur5th said...

I believe that Ellmers should not have made the ad. The way that she presented it makes it seem that she "hates" Muslims and that she doesn't want them to do what they technically have the right to do. In reality, she can't really make them not put a mosque up with all the freedoms guaranteed to the people in the U.S. I think that this ad is more her trying to round up other people who also disapprove of the mosque being built, so that they can protest it. I don't believe that one should be built that close to Ground Zero just out of respect for what happened, but I also don't think they should build a church either.

Chelsea Huffhines 2nd said...

Many Americans don’t seem to keep constant, in-depth tabs on minor political issues, so this was really just one of the few big issues Ellmers could put into her ad that would be understood and more importantly remembered. While North Carolina voters may not know or be interested in what she would actually be doing in Congress, they would be interested in her opinion on a huge and current debate (regardless of its significance to North Carolina an her ability to make a difference with it). It’s simply an irrelevant scramble to try and get media attention by taking advantage of the American people’s hearts.

caitlinmills1 said...

I don't think that this ad was "race baiting." Although it was pretty offensive I think Ellmers was just trying to put herself on the map. Like they said in the article she was "little-known" and hadn't raised even half as much money as Etheridge. She is a congressional candidate from North Carolina so why is she getting so involved about issues in New York? She obviously wanted to pick a hot topic that she could get a lot of attention from. With her uneloquent, blunt, elementary ad she got exactly what she wanted. Now her ad has caught the eye of "...political blogs...Capitol Hill newspapers, and cable news networks." What more could she ask for? I think its easy to see that she was behind in the race and was willing to do whatever she could to make herself relevant.

courtneyfleming01 said...

People should be able to express their religion without people telling them no they can't. I stand in the middle of this because I don't know all of the facts and so I can't make a final decision. If they want to build a mosque near ground zero I say let them do it. But I don't think anyone should build anything on top of ground zero.

Dakota Limon 2nd said...

I think that all of this, especially the ad, was entirely uncalled for. And a little striking to see the extent in which this situation has been taken. I think that claiming the Muslim establishment of faith is a condescending "victory mosque" is a little ridiculous. I think that you can easily disagree with an issue such as this without being wholly disrespectful to all Muslims, and taking it this far.

Rihin Chavda Prd-1st said...

I do not think it is a "victory mosque" but again, as they said they have made mosques after conquering Jerusalem, Cordoba and Constantinople in the early A.D.'s, but they have not conquered America so it can not be a victory mosque. But i agree to them, and they shouldn't be building a mosque so close to ground zero after such an incident, seems to me like they are just trying to establish a sense of superiority and trying to show their strength and power of causing 9/11 and after that building a mosque right there. Causing emotional strength.

Samantha Brookes 2nd said...

Wow. Umm... Where to start. I understand why some people are upset, but i really don't thinl this is that big of a deal. If they want to build their mosque then let them. I think that if it really was a victory mosque then they would be proclaiming that and not hiding or disguising it as something else because the muslims who would do such a thing are so proud and strong in their faith that they would be shouting it from rooftops. Also we as americans take pride in our freedom and diversity and acceptance and for us not to let them build this mosque would be hypicritical. I think we should be the bigger person and the best way to get back at someone is to kill them with kindness.

Samantha Brookes 2nd said...

Wow. Umm... Where to start. I understand why some people are upset, but i really don't thinl this is that big of a deal. If they want to build their mosque then let them. I think that if it really was a victory mosque then they would be proclaiming that and not hiding or disguising it as something else because the muslims who would do such a thing are so proud and strong in their faith that they would be shouting it from rooftops. Also we as americans take pride in our freedom and diversity and acceptance and for us not to let them build this mosque would be hypicritical. I think we should be the bigger person and the best way to get back at someone is to kill them with kindness.

john wardroup 2nd said...

...sorry every time I hear how hated the Islamic people are in America because of the acts of those select groups that attacked America, it quite honestly makes me sick and to know that people are using that sad event to try to get elected is just a shame and makes me very sad. it's also a shame that we do not see every person for who they are but see our preconceived notions we choose not to change...

Anonymous said...

It sounds like Ellmers is just trying to bring more attention to herself in order to get more support. She is also pushing her opinion on people instead of letting people come to their own opinion.

Jessica D'Cruz 1 said...

I very strongly disagree with "there should b a mosic at ground zero" (or near ground zero) and i also think that they shouldnt hate on her just because of her opinon on the sitution. that's just wat she believes and she is getting it out there but putting up false information is wrong but you get false information every where. so i don't think wat she did is wrong many americans belive that there shouldnt be a mosic around ground zero and then people are coming back saying that there racist or watever..no there not it's just kind of a slap in the face to all of those people who died.. at least that's what i think..