Tuesday, September 21, 2010
Town Hall Gets Personal For Obama
President Barack Obama defended his economic program in starkly personal terms Monday after coming face-to-face with supporters who said, bluntly, that he had let them down.
The first two questioners from the audience at a live CNBC town hall meeting both expressed a sense of personal disappointment with Obama, with one man asking, “Is the American Dream dead?” And CNBC’s moderator John Harwood asked Obama whether his elite education, personal style and “racial heritage” might make it hard for average Americans to believe that he is feeling their suffering.
“I think when unemployment is high and people are having a tough time it doesn’t matter if I was green, it doesn’t matter if I was purple, people would still be frustrated and understandably so,” Obama said. “The whole reason I ran was because my life is a testament to the American dream.”
Obama sought to use his own narrative as the child of a single mother to push back against the notion that he is out of touch with the middle class.
One audience member, a chief financial officer with two children soon to go to college, said she was afraid her “new reality” would including struggling just to keep decent food on the table. “I’ve been told that I voted for a man who was going to change things for the middle class, . . .and I’m waiting sir, I don’t feel it yet,” she said.
“Times are tough for everybody right now. I understand your frustration,” Obama responded, adding that new consumer protection rules on things like mortgages and credit cards would help the middle class as would tax breaks for small businesses that create new jobs.
Another audience member, a young public interest lawyer, said he was “really inspired by you and your campaign and the message you brought, and that inspiration is dying away, and it feels like the American dream is moving away from us. . . .Is the American dream dead?”
"Absolutely not,” Obama said. “There is not a country in the world that would not want to change places with us for all the problems we have got.”
In his answer to the lawyer and others, Obama returned to his argument that he inherited an economy laid low by 10 years of bad decision-making and that his policies headed off an even deeper recession, and now are turning things around, but acknowledged it was happening more slowly than anyone would like.
“What we saw happening during 2001 till the time I took office was wages actually declining for middle class families, people treading water, young people having trouble getting their foot in the door in terms of businesses. We are now having to go back to the fundamentals of what made America great and that means that we have to make sure that our markets are working in a way that is good for a broad base of people and not just a narrow base of people,” Obama said.
At another point, he said, “It’s slow and steady as opposed to the kind of quick fix that I think a lot of people would like to see, but. . .it took us a decade to get into the problem we’re in right now.”
Obama also sought to rebut the argument from business leaders that he is hostile to private industry.
Asked if he distrusted the profit motive, as many business leaders believe, Obama said that was “absolutely not” the case, adding that “modest reforms” such as those he has supported are often initially resisted.
He cited the creation of the FDIC as one example of a reform initial strongly resisted by the financial industry. He also repeatedly cited the multiple tax breaks Congress has passed for small business as well as new proposals he has put forward to reduce taxes on research and development as examples of his “pro-business agenda.”
Obama said he had not made any final decisions about his economic team staying on after a midterm election in which Democrats are expected to lose the House of Representatives. But he added that Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner and National Economic Council Chairman Larry Summers and other members of the team are doing “an outstanding job.”
But he added that “decisions about family” would in part determine how many members of the economic team stay after the midterms.
The president once again firmly opposed extending the Bush administration tax cuts on the wealthiest two percent of earners who make over $200,000 for individuals or $250,000 for families. Some moderate Democrats in Congress have taken the opposite stance, saying that all the tax cuts should remain in place while the economy remains weak.
“I’m speaking against my own financial interests here. It’s an irresponsible thing for us to do. Those folks are least likely to spend it,” Obama said.
Obama added, “I can’t give tax cuts to the top 2 percent of Americans, 86 percent of which would go to people making a million dollars or more, and lower the deficit at the same time. I don’t have the math. I would love to do it. Anybody in elected office would love nothing more than to give everyone tax cuts.”
Obama also made a strong push for his proposed new $50 billion infrastructure spending plan. "China spends 9 percent [of GDP] on infrastructure, we are spending 2 percent, which is why are roads are so messed up."
But in a nod to those who say the plan is not big enough, Obama said there was "no free lunch" on spending and that decisions have to be balanced against the rising federal deficit.
Obama had some tough words for China, arguing that its policy of keeping its currency artificially low is doing significant damage to the U.S. economy. "You can't just sell to us and we can't sell to you," he said. "We have been bringing more actions against China before the WTO and we are going to enforce our trade laws much more effectively." He added, "I am pro-trade. I just want to make sure trade is good for American business and American workers.”
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
9 comments:
I sympathize with the chief financial officer. Her words are very powerful and meaningful with what's going on in a lot of American hearts. What happen to Yes we can? and change chang change? This is not to say that Obama is cheating the middle class intentionall, but hhe is showing a big part of his naivete when he was campaigning- He led americans to believe in a quick fix that he now argues against.
Also, during the interview, he seemed to do a whole lot of defending himself. It really wasn't the time and place- not that I believe that when he is attacked personally and he should just deal, but, one, the didn't really attack his chacter as much as he seemed to react to and, two, these were upset Americans grieving and all he did was shoot back answers that didn't match
For once I agree with the president. That tax cuts on the top 2 percent of Americans is unfair to those who have tax cuts but struggling to enough food on the table. The top 2 percent can and has the money to pay for taxes because considering how much they make a year is pretty obvious.
I really wish Obama would stop worrying about the Bush Administrations spending and actually spend time trying to reverse the poor economy. Instead of turning the deficit and government spending dramatically based on the Congressional Budget Office data. I would just like to point out that he continues to cast all the blame on the previous administration while greatly outspending it. Only time will tell whether Obama's investments turn out to be successful but until that time he should probably worry about his administration and stop pointing fingers.
I think that Obama is seeing the repercussions of a campaign platform that inspired an expectation for drastic CHANGE; something that does not happen quickly. It's implied (at least to me) that all candidates want to change things. But making that the slogan of a campaign is not a very wise move.
I especially like the part where he says that it took us sobmuch years to get into this mess then it's taking us to fix it. Also Its very true as humans we want as patient to get thing done as we are messing thing up It will defintly take time to fix this situation I don't think the american dream is destroyed I think it's begining to form
I think the president is finally in the ball park with what he is campaigning for. Tax cuts aren't really fair to take from the top two percent but it does seem necessary in order for the economy to finally have a pick me up. But he does really need to quit talking so much and start acting
I applaud Obama for handling these grievances as best as he has. Some people should just understand that yes change is coming, but it cannot happen over night. It takes time to untangle a rope that's been twisted every which way.
It is unfair that the top 2 percent of Americans getting tax cuts want more. I wish people weren't so greedy and would learn to seek help for others and not just themselves, knowing that they are well off and don't really need "help".
us as americans want the very best things all at once. We as citizens are very selfish. So when Obama said all those promises to win the election the people wanted them right then and there. It is almost 2 years since hes been in office and still some of those promises havent even been worked on.. So we can be a little upset and question everything he has done since he was elected.
The President is doing his best. Once these sorts of things happen to economy only time can heal all, results aren't happening as quickly as people want them to, but we just have to be patient and then see what happens as progress is made like what Obama is doing now.
Post a Comment