Thursday, January 29, 2009

Scoreboard....GOP Motivation


"I won."

When President Barack Obama used those words to reply to Republican objections to the massive spending bill working its way through Congress, he did much more than deliver a good laugh line and declare the GOP proposals irrelevant.

Obama also signaled to us all that the campaign talk about bipartisanship and “a new way” was just the clever rhetoric of a highly choreographed campaign.

“I won” is the confident declaration of a leader who doesn’t need his opponents’ approval or votes.

“I won” is a little extra measure of contempt, though surely delivered with a grin.

“I won” means the Republicans lost and they had better get used to being ignored.

It is also a tremendously liberating and unmistakable message to the GOP as its House wing gathers on retreat this weekend. They don’t have to worry about being accused by the president’s wall-to-wall admirers in the mainstream media of a grumpy, “old politics” attachment to partisanship in Washington’s new era. Obama brought the curtain down on the 48-hour era of bipartisanship with those two words.

“I won” is of course a celebration of partisan triumph, and a hard-earned and clearly defined victory it was. Many voters didn’t think they were voting for an “I won” kind of guy, but observers of the always competitive Obama can’t be surprised. Hillary Clinton knows. John McCain knows. And now House and Senate Republicans know.

Maybe even some of the smitten press will figure it out. This is a tough Chicago pol, not some sort of faith healer.

So what to do? I was invited to join the House GOP in West Virginia this weekend, but try getting from California to there and back in time for the Super Bowl. Here’s what I would have said had they had the good sense to gather on the West Coast:

Every day requires a disciplined message delivered by a senior figure that focuses on a key difference between the president’s agenda and that of the Republicans, a message that contains facts about what the Democrats are proposing and how it affects voters.

There should always be a designated member or senator ready to go on any radio or TV show — no matter how inconvenient the timing or how small the market — to make that and related points. The party needs to vote as a party and explain its opposition every step of the way. Keep asking Mitt Romney, Mike Huckabee, Sarah Palin, Tim Pawlenty, Bobby Jindal and other senior GOP figures to appear alongside you in D.C to make points and guide press coverage. Deliver expertise on such things as cap and trade, and rebuild the platform into a coherent whole.


The party has to establish and fill the coffers of funds devoted exclusively to taking back House and Senate seats. The new party chairman and Minority Leaders John A. Boehner and Mitch McConnell have to talk about restoring balance to D.C. as soon as possible in order to stop the hemorrhaging of money that has begun in the first week of the new administration.

Candidate recruitment is already behind schedule. List the 50 most competitive House seats held by Dems and rally behind a viable candidate. On the Senate side, open an account for whichever Republican eventually wins the primary in Arkansas and other states where the GOP can mount a challenge to an incumbent Dem. The country is 21 months away from a recalibration of the power grid in D.C. Take every opportunity to say: “This might have worked out if the Democrats didn’t run everything.” Tell incumbents they are on their own. Raise money for challengers.

On Monday, Boehner’s office distributed a guide to the spending proposed by House Democrats that included notes on the $600 million set aside to buy new government cars, $50 million for arts funding and $44 million for rehabbing the Department of Agriculture. These are the sorts of data points that define the Democrats in the public’s mind and raise the chances of a snap-back in 2010. But they are needed on every single bill that crosses the Congress from House to Senate or Senate to House.

And in the new media world, the GOP staff should be distributing not just e-mails but audio and video of the Democrats saying what they really think. Republicans are along for the ride, with zero control over direction or destination, but with a perfect back seat from which to describe the inanity of the driving and the direction. Don’t wait for Rick Sanchez on CNN to discover the zaniest thing John Conyers has said today — push it out to him and every other talking head across the country. Help the networks and talk shows and blogs tell the story of the Obama era in all its details, not just the ones the White House wants to push.

The new media outreach effort to activists is not remotely up to speed, but there are signs it is getting better. Check out ReadTheStimulus.org for a glimpse at what distributed networks can achieve.

Americans wanted a stimulus bill that would produce rapid expansion in jobs and economic activity. They are instead being offered a federal fire hose of payoffs and pork, the only utility of which is to underscore that a long eight years out of the White House didn’t change basic Democratic impulses. This is a teaching moment with few equals, and the GOP needs to pound it home again and again: Giving the Democrats all of the power meant giving them all of the money, and they intend to spend it.

“I won” was a sharp slap in the face of the GOP, but it ought to have hit the American people as well. At this point, all the GOP can do is make a play-by-play commentary of where the money is going. They have begun to do that and need to keep it up.

6 comments:

Allan Stellar said...

Enjoyed your post!

Although Obama has been a bit more conciliatory than the "I won" statement you espouse. Even after the Republicans shunned the Stimulus package, Obama still invited the Republican leadership to the White House for a beer. This despite personally meeting with the House Republicans the previous day (and not receiving one GOP vote).

And this stimulus package was a heck of a lot better than the package Bush sold to salvage the financial system. Same price tag for both; the Republican version led to bonuses for rich folks. Who cares about reseeding the Capitol Mall? That's a lot better than helping Bank of America buy Meryl Lynch complete with a fire sale of million dollar, tax payer finanaced bonuses.

Pity the Republicans. Demographics and their own incompetence have made them irrelevant for the next thirty years. They need a new playbook. Look west. Away from Rush. Look to the program of the Governator of California.

That would make the Republicans matter again, in my opinion.

KatelynWatkins1 said...

It's about time for some honesty. Politics has been bogged down in semantics and passive-aggressive word play for far too long. This isn't a game to be played, a system to be figured out and broken down- it's the making or breaking of a country. No more bias, no more propaganda. As the honorable Dr. Phil might say, "It's time to get real."

Kirsten Alvarez 1st said...

Kirsten Alvarez 1st.

Since our economy and our nation is in dire need of changes to be made, the representatives need to stop bickering and pointing fingers at who's fault it is for our problems today and start working to solve them. Who cares that democrats "won", great, fantastic...now do something with that victory. The country already knows that Obama is president, now we need a leader to step up and fix the problems that we have all, democrats and republicans alike, created for our nation.

If congress decides that a stimulus package is the way to go forth with this problem, wonderful. If representatives want to add to the package before they agree to sign, then add bills that are going to be useful! If congress wants to solve this by throwing more money at it, make sure it creates jobs or something permanent that will continue to be resourceful later on to (ideally)bring us back out of debt.

nick richards1 said...

To imply that Republicans are powerless within the President's first month in office requires a lot of foresight. Some of President Obama's supporters (far from every one of them) were just enticed by one word: "change." These specific few may come to decide that this "change" promised to them just isn't as hip as they imagined it would be. Like anyone without a clear understanding of what they want out of the game of politics or how it works can do, these supporters may flip-flop. People who didn't care about the 2008 election may wake up one day and realize that someone they don't really care for in the slightest is in power. Sooner or later there will come a time when the winner has just as many enemies as friends. The bigger power, whatever you believe that to be, did like George W. Bush "in the now" back in the year 2000. If there's any doubt about the shift of opinion, keep that in mind as you see the omnipresent backlash of that administration today. The Republicans are definitely at a disadvantage now, and the left is by far ahead at time present, but the future is most definitely unwritten.

HannahLambVines1 said...

That is very dissapointing. I had so much hope in Obama. I thought he was going to be a cool guy. Apparently not. That was a really bratty comment. I do not in any way want to deal with someone like that for the next four years.

mirandamartell7 said...

I dont think using those words "I Won" was the best way to say he indeed win but im sure he didnt mean it in a bad way, we all say stuff like that if we were in a competition so its really not a big deal seriously c'mon now hes gonna make mistakes, we all do no1's perfect and yes hes the president but hes also human hes not a god thats gonna do everything right.