Wednesday, January 13, 2010

Obama to Request Record $708 Billion



WASHINGTON (AP) - President Barack Obama will ask Congress for an additional $33 billion to fight unpopular wars in Afghanistan and Iraq on top of a record $708 billion for the Defense Department next year, The Associated Press has learned - a request that could be an especially hard sell to some of the administration's Democratic allies.

The extra $33 billion in 2010 would mostly go toward the expansion of the war in Afghanistan. Obama ordered an extra 30,000 troops for that war as part of an overhaul of the war strategy late last year.

Military officials have suggested that the 2011 request would top $700 billion for the first time, but the precise figure has not been made public.

The administration also plans to tell Congress next month that its central military objectives for the next four years will include winning the current wars while preventing new ones and that its core missions will include both counterinsurgency and counterterrorism operations.

The administration's Quadrennial Defense Review, the main articulation of U.S. military doctrine, is due to Congress on Feb. 1. Top military commanders were briefed on the document at the Pentagon on Monday and Tuesday. They also received a preview of the administration's budget plans through 2015.

The four-year review outlines six key mission areas and spells out capabilities and goals the Pentagon wants to develop. The pilotless drones used for surveillance and attack missions in Afghanistan and Pakistan are a priority, with the goals of speeding up the purchase of new Reaper drones and expanding Predator and Reaper drone flights through 2013.

U.S. officials outlined the coming requests on condition of anonymity because the budget request will not be sent to Congress until later this month.

Obama's request for more war spending is likely to receive support on Capitol Hill, where Republicans will join moderate Democrats to pass the bill.

But the budget debate is also likely to expose a widening rift between Obama's administration and Democratic leaders, who have watched public opinion turn against the military campaign.
"The president's going to have to make his case," House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., told reporters last month at her year-end briefing.

The 2010 budget contains about $128 billion for military operations in Iraq and Afghanistan.
That figure would rise to $159 billion next year under the proposals prepared for Congress.

The Pentagon projects that war funding would drop sharply in 2012, to $50 billion, and remain there through 2015. That is a calculation that the United States will save money from the withdrawal of forces in Iraq, as well as a prediction that the Afghanistan war will begin to wind down in the middle of 2011.

Obama has promised that U.S. forces will begin to withdraw from Afghanistan in July 2011, but his defense advisers have set no time limit for the war.

The Pentagon projects that overall defense spending would be $616 billion in 2012; $632 billion in 2013; $648 billion in 2014; and $666 billion in 2015. Congress sets little store by such predictions, which typically have fallen short of actual requests and spending.

Defense Secretary Robert Gates and Adm. Mike Mullen, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, are expected to testify to Congress about the budget and the policy review in February.

The four-year policy statement is a more important statement of administration goals. For the current wars, the policy statement focuses on efforts to refocus money and talent on beefing up special operations forces, countering weapons of mass destruction and terrorism threats, and maintaining cyber security.

For example, the Pentagon would like to expand special operations aviation by expanding the gunship fleet from 25 to 33.

13 comments:

andrearamirez8th said...

More money and soldiers are being put into this war. The U.S is facing more and more debt in order to bring in more weapons for a war that has been on for more than eight years! A new record will be set indeed for this war to continue.

MichaelHarper1 said...

In my humble opinion president Obama should without a doubt recieve as much funding as is required to secure a victory in this war. Now that is not to say that we should throw money at the problem without keeping tabs on how it is being spent. That being said the pentagon seems to be spending the funds on the proper equipment and strategy. Drones have been invaluable in a conflict where pinpoint strikes are a necessity, and lets face it is there such a thing as having too many gunships. As for the unpopularity of the war being a factor in budgetary decision, I dont believe that it should be an issue at all. We cant pull out of afghanistan because the public has lost faith in the war. This war is at this point a must win. The last thing the world needs is another failed state, especially in such a volatile area. As for those individuals who would rather see the U.S. leave afghanistan prematurely I challenge you to hop on a plane to pakistan and as the last marine battalion hops in their humvees and rolls out of the country you go ahead and roll on in and see just how hot it gets how fast. Whether we like it or not the people of afghanistan depend on us for protection and we cannot abandon them. So give Obama as much cash as he needs because we broke it and now we have to buy it.

JasonWilkes3 said...

I find it ironic that after proclaiming that he would pull all the troops out of Iraq, Obama simply sent everyone to Afghanistan.However i do support his policy for the surge. Hopefully it will push attacks down to a low enough level to allow more troops to rotate home and withdrawal of the majority of combat troops.
Looking at where the money is going, mainly spec ops, cyber security, and counter WMD gives me the feeling that Obama wants to do the one thing that Bush never could... Find Osama (If he isn't dead already)

JacobCauser10th said...

Wasn't the government supposed to be ending the war? not escalating it? This goes against alot of things that the President has been saying. Though he hasn't kept his word so far, I guess we shouldn't expect anything less... Though to end on a lighter note, I would love to drive one of those tanks!!!

Mr. P said...

Jason, if you will recall, President Obama campaigned on removal of troops from Iraq but also INCREASING troops in Afghanistan.
His belief is that the main cause of the terrrorism against the U.S. is based there, not in Iraq.

Anonymous said...

yeah, i'm not sure how we linked 9/11 so closely to iraq to have us go to war with saddam. Sure, it was called Operation Iraqi Freedom, but it seems kinda random... Theres plenty of other countrys going through the same or worse crap than iraq went through, africa maby??? Afghanistan is where the people are who attacked us, (if they're still alive, like jason said) i'm not sure what bush was thinking about iraq...

JasonWilkes3 said...

I understand that Mr. P, its just funny that so many people were surprised by it.

Stephen Garcia_3rd said...

Obama should be given all the money he needs to see the war through to the end. To pull out now is simply an impossibility because, as Michael said, the people of Afghanistan rely on us for their well-being and safety. If we continue to fight this war without adequate funding, the lives of not only the people of Afghanistan will be put at risk, our own soldiers will not have the resources to do what it is they were sent to do. Without proper funding for drones, the armed forces will be as good as blind out there.

Ksenia Kolesnikova 8th period said...

It is unbelievable how much money is put into this war. I understand president Obama's concern to make sure that we end up with a victory and regain the public's trust. But the United States is ultimately going to hit rock botttom with the amount of debt it has accumulated. Overall, I don't completely agree with president Obama's request.

ChrisFlores8th said...

I think that the decisions that Obama made for the war about sending more troops over and using more money will be better for us in the long run. The troops will get to have longer stays at home and hopefully will shorten our time over there in Iraq. No matter how much i disagree with Obama, I support him on this.

Yudi Zhang 4th said...

I've been tired about hearing this kind of news. President Obama promised the war will be ended. no matter how much it cost, I just wish that will happen soon.

KatieRoberson8thPd. said...

I agree with Jason in the irony of the situation. I support Obama's endeavors to secure a victory in this war because a victory will mean the safety of our victimized nation as well as our neighboring nations and allies. I am also in agreement of the plan’s specific emphasis on special ops because I believe this is an area in which the military can get the toughest jobs done the fastest. I do not, however, agree with setting a “due date” to end the war in 2011. I think this will add pressure to the war efforts, meaning higher and faster spending in a rush to end the war quickly, and not effectively.

DavidHinojosa4 said...

Well honestly as a Country we are already in debt as is. What is a few more billion dollars going to do, but I must say that why do we need to give our military even more money than what they need. We are already the most powerfull nation in the world and all we ever do is put fear into making other countries thinking that we can do whatever we want. I think that all Obama will do is just piss of more Republicans and waste even more money that we don't even have. But who knows maybe all this stimulation will help for the better but I doubt it.