Wednesday, February 18, 2009
Doubling Down On Afghanistan
WASHINGTON — President Obama said Tuesday that he would send an additional 17,000 American troops to Afghanistan this spring and summer, putting his stamp firmly on a war that he has long complained is going in the wrong direction.
The order will add nearly 50 percent to the 36,000 American troops already there. A further decision on sending more troops will come after the administration completes a broader review of Afghanistan policy, White House officials said.
Mr. Obama said in a written statement that the increase was “necessary to stabilize a deteriorating situation in Afghanistan, which has not received the strategic attention, direction and resources it urgently requires.”
At least for now, Mr. Obama’s decision gives American commanders in Afghanistan most but not all of the troops they had asked for. But the decision also carries political risk for a president who will be sending more troops to Afghanistan before he has begun to fulfill a promised rapid withdrawal of troops from Iraq.
Many experts worry that Afghanistan presents an even more formidable challenge for the United States than Iraq does, particularly with neighboring Pakistan providing sanctuary for insurgents of the Taliban and Al Qaeda.
Under Mr. Obama’s plan, a unit of 8,000 marines from Camp Lejeune, N.C., will be deployed in the next few weeks, aiming to be in Afghanistan by late spring, administration officials said, while an Army brigade from Fort Lewis, Wash., composed of 4,000 soldiers, will be sent in the summer. An additional 5,000 Army support troops will also be deployed in the summer.
Antiwar groups criticized Mr. Obama’s decision even before the White House announced it.
“The president is committing these troops before he’s determined what the mission is,” said Tom Andrews, director of the coalition organization Win Without War. “We need to avoid the slippery slope of military escalation.”
Mr. Obama said in his statement that “the fact that we are going to responsibly draw down our forces in Iraq allows us the flexibility to increase our presence in Afghanistan.”
American generals in Afghanistan had been pressing for additional forces to be in place by late spring or early summer to help counter growing violence and chaos in the country. Of the 30,000 additional troops that the commanders had initially sought, some 6,000 arrived in January after being sent by President Bush.
The administration’s review of Afghanistan policy is supposed to be completed before early April, when Mr. Obama heads to Europe for a NATO summit meeting at which he is expected to press American allies for more troops and help in Afghanistan.
In an interview with the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation on Tuesday, Mr. Obama said he was “absolutely convinced that you cannot solve the problem of Afghanistan, the Taliban, the spread of extremism in that region solely through military means.”
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
6 comments:
I think that more troop in Afghanistan is a good move on Obama's part. He will prolly take a major hit for this though. I agree with the article in that there are more threats to us in Afghanistan compared to Iraq. Americans have spoken and they are tired of being at war whether it is necessary or not.
WOW!!!!
Its amazing what happens when your actually the president and not just a name on a ballot. Im surprised to hear that Obama is sending more troops instead of just pulling them out; though i'm glad that he is sending them in instead of pulling them out. It makes more sense to send the reinforcements that are needed for a short time than to pull out before the job is finished and drag out the war longer than necessary. All in all, it's good to hear that this could be a big step forward towards ending the war instead of prolonging it.
Surprise surprise!! This is the last thing that i thought he would do. There are going to be some very upset people who thought that when he said pull out of Iraq he meant the whole middle east. I think that while we do still need an obvious presence in Iraq that being in Afghanistan is also a great move. I think that most people will be surprised when they hear this. When i was reading the article i checked multipal times to make sure that this guy was a democrat. For a few moments there i thought we had another republican leader.
If the quagmire that is the war on terror which we now have to win since we started it is going to end multiple things need to happen.
1 The U.s. must realize that this is a war of attrition with the a large portion enemy not afraid to die.
2.We must listen to the men there fighting it.
3.The leaders of Islam must also preach against the violence that some of them are encouraging.
4.Also the U.S. must realize it is going to get worse before it gets better.
If the quagmire that is the war on terror which we now have to win since we started it is going to end multiple things need to happen.
1 The U.s. must realize that this is a war of attrition with the a large portion enemy not afraid to die.
2.We must listen to the men there fighting it.
3.The leaders of Islam must also preach against the violence that some of them are encouraging.
4.Also the U.S. must realize it is going to get worse before it gets better.
I am SO not happy to hear that Obama is sending more troops to Afghanistan. What does he think this will accomplish? What is he TRYING to accomplish? All that will happen is more American blood is going to be spilled on soil in a foreign country whose citizens know the terrain better than we do. (Surprise!)
Troops in Afghanistan are in FAR more danger than they are in Iraq. Afghanistan is like Swiss cheese; there's places for booby traps galore.
So much for a "safe return home" for our military friends and family. That's a SAFE return home all right... in a body bag. If there's enough left to put in the body bag, that is.
Post a Comment