In a brief and hastily called news conference Monday just after 10 p.m., Mr. Romney acknowledged having made the blunt political and cultural assessment, saying it was “not elegantly stated,” but he stood by the substance of the remarks, insisting that he had made similar observations in public without generating controversy.
The video of Mr. Romney, the Republican presidential candidate, was made in May, offering a rare glimpse of his personal views. Mr. Romney told reporters that he had been “speaking off the cuff in response to a question” at the fund-raiser, and said he wanted “to help all Americans — all Americans — have a bright, prosperous future.”
Democrats quickly condemned the remarks as insensitive, and Mr. Obama’s campaign accused Mr. Romney of having “disdainfully written off half the nation.”
The video surfaced as the campaign enters its final 50 days and as Mr. Romney sought to restart his campaign with new ads and new messaging, in response to calls in his campaign and from outside for him to be more specific about how his policies would fix the nation’s economy and help the middle class.
Now, the video has raised the possibility that Mr. Romney’s campaign will be sidetracked, with attention focused again on his proposed tax cuts for the wealthy, the release of his personal tax returns and his ability to connect with middle-class voters. With its unvarnished language, the video seems to undermine what aides have argued is an enduring attribute that would appeal to independent voters: a sense that Mr. Romney is, at base, an empathetic and caring man.
Snippets of the video of Mr. Romney were posted online Monday afternoon by Mother Jones, a liberal magazine, which said it had obtained the recording and had confirmed its authenticity. The magazine said it was concealing the identity of the person who had recorded the video and the location and time of the recording.
The author of the Mother Jones article, David Corn, said on MSNBC that the video was shot on May 17 at the
In one clip, Mr. Romney describes how his campaign would not try to appeal to “47 percent of the people” who will vote for Mr. Obama “no matter what.” They are, he says, “dependent upon government, who believe that they are victims, who believe the government has a responsibility to care for them.”
He says those people “pay no income tax,” and “so our message of low taxes doesn’t connect.” Mr. Romney adds: “My job is not to worry about those people. I’ll never convince them they should take personal responsibility and care for their lives.”
The comments were much more stark than Mr. Romney’s usual remarks, though he typically talks in public about supporters of Mr. Obama’s wanting big government to take care of their problems. He often accuses Mr. Obama and his supporters of wanting to bring a European-style socialism to the
Mr. Romney addressed the video, somewhat awkwardly, at a fund-raiser Monday night in Costa Mesa, Calif., summoning reporters with a few moments’ notice to walk through the Segerstrom Center for the Arts, which was filled with guests sipping drinks at tables elegantly draped in blue cloths.
Mr. Romney said his comments addressed “a question about direction for the country: Do you believe in a government-centered society that provides more and more benefits? Or do you believe instead in a free-enterprise society where people are able to pursue their dreams?”
Asked whether he delivers different, starker messages to wealthy donors than he does to ordinary voters at campaign rallies, Mr. Romney said he was offering the same message, though he has never used the language in the video at a public event.
But Mr. Romney acknowledged that he wanted to offer donors a candid sense of his strategy, given the role they play in his campaign. “That’s something which fund-raising people who are parting with their monies are very interested in — knowing can you win or not and that’s what this was addressing,” he said.
Mr. Romney, who has been under fire for releasing only two years of his tax returns, was quickly attacked by the Obama campaign. Jim Messina, Mr. Obama’s campaign manager, said in a statement Monday evening that it was “shocking” that Mr. Romney would “go behind closed doors” to describe nearly half of the country in such terms.
Late Monday night, Mr. Messina sent out a fund-raising appeal to Mr. Obama’s supporters, saying that someone “who demonstrates such disgust and disdain for half of our fellow Americans” does not deserve to be president.
Mr. Romney is not the first presidential candidate to be caught speaking candidly at a fund-raiser. Four years ago during the Democratic primary campaign, The
The Romney video was unearthed apparently with help from James Carter, a grandson of former President
In an audio clip posted online from the same fund-raiser, apparently by the person who gave the videos to Mother Jones, Mr. Romney is heard joking that he would have an easier time winning the election if his father had been born to Mexican parents.
“My dad, as you probably know, was the governor of
But the most striking part of the video is Mr. Romney’s characterization of nearly half of the country. His assessment of the “47 percent” echoes a line of conservative thinking that is championed by his running mate, Representative
Mr. Romney’s figure of 47 percent comes from the Tax Policy Center, which found that 46.4 percent of households paid no federal income tax in 2011.
But most households did pay payroll taxes. Of the 18.1 percent of households that paid neither income taxes nor payroll taxes, the center found that more than half were elderly and more than a third were not elderly but had income under $20,000. Roberton Williams, a senior fellow at the center, wrote in a blog post last summer that about half of those were off the rolls because they had low incomes.
8 comments:
Although Mitt Romney's statements in the video were incredibly blunt, I agree (as a young voter) that his chances of becoming President would be greater if he was a minority. My eighth grade year at O.L. Slaton, the whole school took part in a fake presidential election. I voted for John McCain because I agreed with more of his policies than Barack Obama's. I took my parent's advice by becoming more familiar with their campaigns, rather than strictly basing my vote off of their party association. Many of my classmates asked me who I voted for. When I replied, they immediately accused me of racism. However when I asked who they voted for (the peer being African American or Hispanic), they said Obama because he would be the first black president, not because of his policies. That's the first time I experienced "reverse racism." I believe that my middle school experience is a mirror image of many American voters because many are not involved with politics and only consider race.
Although Mitt Romney's statements in the video were incredibly blunt, I agree (as a young voter) that his chances of becoming President would be greater if he was a minority. My eighth grade year at O.L. Slaton, the whole school took part in a fake presidential election. I voted for John McCain because I agreed with more of his policies than Barack Obama's. I took my parent's advice by becoming more familiar with their campaigns, rather than strictly basing my vote off of their party association. Many of my classmates asked me who I voted for. When I replied, they immediately accused me of racism. However when I asked who they voted for (the peer being African American or Hispanic), they said Obama because he would be the first black president, not because of his policies. That's the first time I experienced "reverse racism." I believe that my middle school experience is a mirror image of many American voters because many are not involved with politics and only consider race.
This video makes Romney look awful. It was extremely unintelligent of him to disparage half of a country that will decide whether or not he'll become president. I don't understand his belief that the 47% are not his problem. You can't be the President of the US and just decide to ignore half of the population. They are your problem, and they are your responsibility. Why would they elect you otherwise? Also, the belief that people aren't entitled to food and shelter doesn't sit well with me. People who live on the street didn't get there because they were "too lazy," they're typically mentally or socially challenged.
Mr. Romney’s remarks about 47% of America’s population were inadequately stated. I thought that perhaps since he is running for U.S. president he would have more consideration for the American people and their well being. I mean, really? He plans to be the president of the United States and only help those who already have it made? Regardless of the peoples social economic level his responsibility as the president is that of the entire American population to ensure a prosperous future for the people and our nation as a whole. Just because half of the community may not be as he would like them to be doesn’t mean he can just forget about them and take only into account those he prefers best. He should take into account what kind of people make up the 47% such as people that were laid off do to the economic crisis. A vast number of those who don’t pay taxes are those who, at their time worked and paid taxes like others but are now retired and sustained by social security. People with physical limitations or disabilities make up a great part of the 47% as well. Maybe the republican candidate should also take into account the fact that part of the 47% consist of disabled veterans who once fought for our country as a whole and are now unable to work.
Mr. Romney’s remarks about 47% of America’s population were inadequately stated. I thought that perhaps since he is running for U.S. president he would have more consideration for the American people and their well being. I mean, really? He plans to be the president of the United States and only help those who already have it made? Regardless of the peoples social economic level his responsibility as the president is that of the entire American population to ensure a prosperous future for the people and our nation as a whole. Just because half of the community may not be as he would like them to be doesn’t mean he can just forget about them and take only into account those he prefers best. He should take into account what kind of people make up the 47% such as people that were laid off do to the economic crisis. A vast number of those who don’t pay taxes are those who, at their time worked and paid taxes like others but are now retired and sustained by social security. People with physical limitations or disabilities make up a great part of the 47% as well. Maybe the republican candidate should also take into account the fact that part of the 47% consist of disabled veterans who once fought for our country as a whole and are now unable to work.
This video could not have come at a worse time for the Romney campaign. His remarks were unsympathetic and close-minded. Romney complains about the lower class not paying enough taxes while he, and other wealthy aristocrats like him, are doing no better by only paying less than 15% of their income tax. My main issue is that this while video is hypocritical and that really puts the right-winged republicans into perspective. Part of this 47% who do not pay federal taxes are soldiers and low economic people who barely have enough money to give in the first place. The people that Romney spoke about as "being victims and dependent on the government" actually make up a very small percentage of actual taxpayers.
I believe that Romney's implication about the 47 percent was a little judgmental because everyone has their own specific reasons for not paying taxes. However, his comment about focusing on neutral voters has sense to it. If I were in Romney's shoes, I would try to sway voters that are most likely to change their minds rather than voters that have set opinions. This doesn't mean that he doesn't care about the whole nation, but rather he's focusing his campaign on those that will receive it. According to an old adage, you shouldn't cast your pearls before swine. This is practically what Romney is saying when he states that he “would not try to appeal to 47 percent of the people who will vote for Mr. Obama no matter what.” I feel like Romney has a disadvantage with the public in that he’s a self-made millionaire. A lot of people can’t relate with him, whereas they can with Obama being a minority. This will aid in their receptiveness to him. Opinions of each candidate should be based on their political intentions, and how they will benefit our country, not on race or wealth.
I'm not sure exactly how accurate Romney's numbers are about the percentage of people who do not pay income tax but I know that the level of dependency is staggering in America today. There rules and policies involving things like food stamps, unemployment and section 8 housing are too loosely regulated. Now I'm not saying they should be abolished, I first hand know the necessarily of these institutions. When the recession hit California it was devastating and my parents lost their business's and we remained on unemployment for a little over 4 months, but got off. Like some people refuse to do. People need to think about what they want from the government. As what was stated in Romney's response in the post conference. If some are so dependent and hate the rich who pay over 90% of our taxes then maybe a communism should be a good idea.
Post a Comment